# Linguistic Bias Mitigation for Spoofing Detection via Gradient Reversal and A Variational Information Bottleneck

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.31411 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.31411/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 24 of its 30 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 30 Jun 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Backpropagation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.7495/) (2014)
- [Deep Variational Information Bottleneck](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.00410/) (2016)
- [XLS-R: Self-supervised Cross-lingual Speech Representation Learning at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.09296/) (2021)
- [MUSAN: A Music, Speech, and Noise Corpus](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1510.08484/) (2015)
- [AASIST: Audio Anti-Spoofing using Integrated Spectro-Temporal Graph Attention Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.01200/) (2021)
- [ASVspoof 2019: Future Horizons in Spoofed and Fake Audio Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.05441/) (2019)
- [End-to-end anti-spoofing with RawNet2](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.01108/) (2020)
- [ASVspoof 2021: accelerating progress in spoofed and deepfake speech detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.00537/) (2021)
- [Does Audio Deepfake Detection Generalize?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.16263/) (2022)
- [SONAR: Sentence-Level Multimodal and Language-Agnostic Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.11466/) (2023)
- [ADD 2022: the First Audio Deep Synthesis Detection Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.08433/) (2022)
- [ASVspoof 5: Crowdsourced Speech Data, Deepfakes, and Adversarial Attacks at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.08739/) (2024)
- [AI-Synthesized Voice Detection Using Neural Vocoder Artifacts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.13085/) (2023)
- [Speech is Silver, Silence is Golden: What do ASVspoof-trained Models Really Learn?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.12914/) (2021)
- [The Codecfake Dataset and Countermeasures for the Universally Detection of Deepfake Audio](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.04880/) (2024)
- [XLSR-Mamba: A Dual-Column Bidirectional State Space Model for Spoofing Attack Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.10027/) (2024)
- [Speech DF Arena: A Leaderboard for Speech DeepFake Detection Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.02859/) (2025)
- [DFADD: The Diffusion and Flow-Matching Based Audio Deepfake Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.08731/) (2024)
- [Where are we in audio deepfake detection? A systematic analysis over generative and detection models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.04324/) (2024)
- [Exploring WavLM Back-ends for Speech Spoofing and Deepfake Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.05032/) (2024)
- [ASVspoof 5: Evaluation of Spoofing, Deepfake, and Adversarial Attack Detection Using Crowdsourced Speech](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.03944/) (2026)
- [Assessing the Impact of Speaker Identity in Speech Spoofing Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.20805/) (2026)
- [Enhancing Multi-Corpus Training in SSL-Based Anti-Spoofing Models: Domain-Invariant Feature Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.18657/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Rapid advancements in generative speech technology have compromised the reliability of voice biometrics. While current spoofing detectors excel when assessed under in-domain conditions, generalisation to out-of-domain settings is often poor. We show that this can be due to linguistic bias. A reliance on linguistic cues observed in training data can then compromise robustness to cross-data. We propose a linguistic-invariant spoofing detection framework utilizing teacher-student adversarial learning. The linguistic-aware teacher model, pre-trained on linguistic content of an external dataset, guides the student detector via gradient reversal to minimize the linguistic information. To prevent the inadvertent removal of non-linguistic cues, we incorporate a Variational Information Bottleneck to enable suppression of principal cues. Across nine DF Arena datasets, our method achieves up to a 36.2% relative reduction in the EER compare to the baseline.