# AtomiMed: Hierarchical Atomic Fact-Checking for Universal Clinical-Aware Medical Report Evaluation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.31292 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.31292/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 30 Jun 2026.

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Can Jev Judge Radiology Reports? Evaluating a System One Model for Clinical Factuality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.27607/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Traditional metrics for Medical Report Generation (MRG) predominantly rely on surface-level n-gram overlap, which fails to capture clinical factual accuracy and often overlooks catastrophic diagnostic errors. We address this fundamental limitation by proposing AtomiMed, a universal, modality-agnostic evaluation framework that decomposes complex medical narratives into a standardized, multi-level hierarchy of Atomic Clinical Facts, encompassing Disease-level entities and Attribute-level descriptors, including location, morphology, and severity. By implementing an Agentic Cross-Verification loop between ground-truth and predicted reports, AtomiMed simulates a multi-radiologist peer-review process to verify clinical consistency, thus enabling the decoupled assessment of diagnostic detection and descriptive accuracy. To facilitate standardized evaluation, we introduce MRGEvalKit, an open-source toolkit for automated hierarchical extraction, and curate OmniMRG-Bench, a comprehensive multi-modal benchmark covering X-ray, CT, MRI, and Ultrasound. Extensive experiments on multiple expert-annotated reader studies demonstrate that AtomiMed achieves significantly higher correlation with human radiologist judgment compared to traditional and model-based metrics. Our code are release at https://github.com/Venn2336/MRGEvalkit
