# Decodable Is Not Grounded: A Vision-Ablation Arbiter for VLM Spatial Reasoning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.31257 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.31257/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 42 of its 43 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 30 Jun 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Spatial and embodied reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/spatial-and-embodied-reasoning/)
- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [Embodied and 3D vision-language models](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/embodied-and-3d-vision-language-models/)
- Mechanistic interpretability / [Interpreting vision and multimodal models](https://mlsanity.com/mechinterp/interpreting-vision-and-multimodal-models/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 42)

- [Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13923/) (2025)
- [Qwen3-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.21631/) (2025)
- [LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.03326/) (2024)
- [Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.05262/) (2022)
- [Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.00837/) (2016)
- [Gemma 3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.19786/) (2025)
- [InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.10479/) (2025)
- [Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01405/) (2023)
- [Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.03341/) (2023)
- [Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 small](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.00593/) (2022)
- [Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Addition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.06681/) (2023)
- [Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.12452/) (2021)
- [SpatialVLM: Endowing Vision-Language Models with Spatial Reasoning Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.12168/) (2024)
- [Designing and Interpreting Probes with Control Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.03368/) (2019)
- [Thinking in Space: How Multimodal Large Language Models See, Remember, and Recall Spaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.14171/) (2024)
- [Don't Just Assume; Look and Answer: Overcoming Priors for Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.00377/) (2017)
- [Language Models Represent Space and Time](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.02207/) (2023)
- [Visual Spatial Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.00363/) (2022)
- [What's "up" with vision-language models? Investigating their struggle with spatial reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.19785/) (2023)
- [SmolVLM: Redefining small and efficient multimodal models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.05299/) (2025)
- [ReFT: Representation Finetuning for Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.03592/) (2024)
- [MMSI-Bench: A Benchmark for Multi-Image Spatial Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.23764/) (2025)
- [Pixtral 12B](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.07073/) (2024)
- [SpatialBot: Precise Spatial Understanding with Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.13642/) (2024)
- [3DSRBench: A Comprehensive 3D Spatial Reasoning Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.07825/) (2024)
- [ViewSpatial-Bench: Evaluating Multi-perspective Spatial Localization in Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.21500/) (2025)
- [OmniSpatial: Towards Comprehensive Spatial Reasoning Benchmark for Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.03135/) (2025)
- [EmbSpatial-Bench: Benchmarking Spatial Understanding for Embodied Tasks with Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.05756/) (2024)
- [MM-Spatial: Exploring 3D Spatial Understanding in Multimodal LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.13111/) (2025)
- [Sparse Autoencoders Learn Monosemantic Features in Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.02821/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Omni-Modal LLMs Know More Than They Say](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.16135/) (2026)
- [Seeing Depth but Choosing Cues in Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.17976/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The standard way to read latent knowledge out of a model, a linear probe confirmed by a steering recovery, can systematically overstate what a vision-language model (VLM) actually grounds in the image. We show this on spatial reasoning, where the error is invisible to both probing and steering yet exposed by a one-line causal control: replacing the image with a gray blank. Probes decode the within-axis answer at 73--97% across axes, and a training-free projection lifts a near-chance axis from 59% to 79%, exactly the signature of unlocking latent knowledge. The blank-image arbiter refutes it, revealing three grounding regimes that probing conflates: an axis can be grounded (vision-dependent, correct), a prior (vision-independent, with its decode and its apparent recovery a directional default rather than perception), or, surprisingly, inverted: decodable, causally controllable, but deployed with the wrong sign, so the model scores below chance and the error requires looking. The taxonomy holds across the studied VLMs: in fourteen models spanning six language-model families and 2B--27B, horizontal is grounded, vertical is a prior, and depth is inverted, with the inversion emerging at scale within families. The decode-versus-deploy inversion replicates on seven of eight models across five families, and the minimal edit that re-deploys it varies with geometry: a training-free rotation matches a trained edit on the cleanest model, while distributed inversions need a trained low-rank edit, tracing a per-model correction-complexity spectrum. The cheap, self-calibrating arbiter cleanly separates grounded perception, inverted perception, and prior substitution; we argue it should be a default control for latent-knowledge and steering claims in VLMs.