# Sequential Planning via Anchored Robotic Keypoints

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.30613 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.30613/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Failure recovery and robustness, one of 13 directions in Vision-language-action models.
- Builds on 51 of its 54 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Jun 2026.

## Placed in

- Vision-language-action models / [Failure recovery and robustness](https://mlsanity.com/vla/failure-recovery-and-robustness/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 51)

- [Segment Anything](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.02643/) (2023)
- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.05499/) (2023)
- [OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.09246/) (2024)
- [SAM 2: Segment Anything in Images and Videos](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.00714/) (2024)
- [π0: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.24164/) (2024)
- [Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.01691/) (2022)
- [Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.16291/) (2023)
- [π0.5: a Vision-Language-Action Model with Open-World Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.16054/) (2025)
- [LIBERO: Benchmarking Knowledge Transfer for Lifelong Robot Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.03310/) (2023)
- [Code as Policies: Language Model Programs for Embodied Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.07753/) (2022)
- [Inner Monologue: Embodied Reasoning through Planning with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.05608/) (2022)
- [Teaching Large Language Models to Self-Debug](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.05128/) (2023)
- [SAM 3: Segment Anything with Concepts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.16719/) (2025)
- [V-JEPA 2: Self-Supervised Video Models Enable Understanding, Prediction and Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.09985/) (2025)
- [VoxPoser: Composable 3D Value Maps for Robotic Manipulation with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.05973/) (2023)
- [Depth Anything 3: Recovering the Visual Space from Any Views](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.10647/) (2025)
- [ProgPrompt: Generating Situated Robot Task Plans using Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.11302/) (2022)
- [robosuite: A Modular Simulation Framework and Benchmark for Robot Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.12293/) (2020)
- [LLM+P: Empowering Large Language Models with Optimal Planning Proficiency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.11477/) (2023)
- [DINO-WM: World Models on Pre-trained Visual Features enable Zero-shot Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.04983/) (2024)
- [ReKep: Spatio-Temporal Reasoning of Relational Keypoint Constraints for Robotic Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.01652/) (2024)
- [Simple Open-Vocabulary Object Detection with Vision Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.06230/) (2022)
- [LIBERO-Plus: In-depth Robustness Analysis of Vision-Language-Action Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.13626/) (2025)
- [ChatGPT for Robotics: Design Principles and Model Abilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.17582/) (2023)
- [Text2Motion: From Natural Language Instructions to Feasible Plans](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.12153/) (2023)
- [LIBERO-PRO: Towards Robust and Fair Evaluation of Vision-Language-Action Models Beyond Memorization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.03827/) (2025)
- [MOKA: Open-World Robotic Manipulation through Mark-Based Visual Prompting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.03174/) (2024)
- [PartImageNet: A Large, High-Quality Dataset of Parts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.00933/) (2021)
- [CaP-X: A Framework for Benchmarking and Improving Coding Agents for Robot Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.22435/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [SynthDemo-RL: Breaking the Zero-Reward Barrier in VLA Adaptation with LLM-Guided Synthetic Demonstrations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.21650/) (2026)
- [DynaHarness: A Dynamic Physical Harness for Self-Evolving Robot Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.40306/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Changes in a robot's observations do not automatically imply changes in the task it is solving, but language-conditioned manipulation systems often fail to separate the two. If an object moves, for example, the locations at which actions should be executed may change while the underlying manipulation plan remains valid. We introduce Sequential Planning via Anchored Robotic Keypoints (SPARK), which separates a task's symbolic plan from its execution-time perceptual grounding, and we experimentally isolate whether a fixed symbolic plan can survive substantial changes to the scene through execution-time re-grounding. SPARK represents the task as a symbolic behavior tree whose object references are grounded to current 3D observations during execution, allowing the robot to update where actions are performed while preserving the plan. Runtime verification then enables local recovery and renewed grounding, only resorting to a new plan if necessary. To test the separation between plan and perceptual-grounding, we perform a set of manipulation experiments with a fixed plan while moving objects during execution. Under a 10 cm displacement, verification and adaptation maintain 66.7pp task success, compared with 2.2pp when disabled, demonstrating the importance of the underlying principle. Without task-specific model training, SPARK also achieves 72.6pp mean success across six LIBERO-PRO settings and 68pp across eleven physical task-embodiment settings on three robot platforms. Together, these results show that robustness does not require re-planning the task and for an important class of failures, it is sufficient to preserve the plan and update the system's perception of a changing world. Code and videos can be found at https://cwru-aism.github.io/spark-page/
