# Early Cue Precision Shapes Visual Shortcut Learning in Controlled Cue-Manipulation Benchmarks

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.30344 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.30344/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 12 of its 22 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Jun 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.14030/) (2021)
- [DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.07193/) (2023)
- [On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.04599/) (2017)
- [Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.12261/) (2019)
- [Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.07780/) (2020)
- [ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.12231/) (2018)
- [Natural Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.07174/) (2019)
- [Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.08731/) (2019)
- [Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Features](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.02175/) (2019)
- [Last Layer Re-Training is Sufficient for Robustness to Spurious Correlations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.02937/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Visual classifiers can achieve high matched-distribution accuracy while relying on low-level cues that fail under conflict or suppression. We test whether this failure is shaped by early cue precision: the reliability with which a low-level cue predicts the label during early learning or downstream probe fitting. Across synthetic shape-texture tasks, sequential digit training, a 10-class frozen-representation audit, and a CIFAR-10 natural-image-based texture-overlay benchmark, we manipulate object-texture match probability and evaluate matched-ID accuracy, conflict accuracy, texture-choice rate, and suppression behavior. Degraded-but-predictive input does not substitute for cue decorrelation. In 10-class digit probes, conflict accuracy drops from 0.589 under chance-like cue precision to 0.005 under target-perfect texture. In CIFAR-10 frozen probes, conflict accuracy drops from 0.569 to 0.114, while texture choice rises from 0.049 to 0.855; this ordering persists across texture-overlay strengths alpha in {0.15,0.25,0.35,0.50}. End-to-end CIFAR-10 training shows that low early cue precision improves pre-target conflict behavior, but shortcut-rich fine-tuning can rapidly overwrite this benefit. Cue decorrelation must therefore be maintained during downstream adaptation rather than treated as a one-time inoculation.