# UrbanCDNet: Appearance-Robust and Boundary-Aware Bitemporal Change Detection for Korean Urban Building Monitoring

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.29781 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.29781/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 18 of its 48 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Jun 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.04597/) (2015)
- [Generalised Dice overlap as a deep learning loss function for highly unbalanced segmentations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.03237/) (2017)
- [Fully Convolutional Siamese Networks for Change Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.08462/) (2018)
- [Remote Sensing Image Change Detection with Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00208/) (2021)
- [A Transformer-Based Siamese Network for Change Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.01293/) (2022)
- [Changer: Feature Interaction is What You Need for Change Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.08290/) (2022)
- [S2Looking: A Satellite Side-Looking Dataset for Building Change Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.09244/) (2021)
- [DASNet: Dual attentive fully convolutional siamese networks for change detection of high resolution satellite images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.03608/) (2020)
- [Transformers in Remote Sensing: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.01206/) (2022)
- [A New Learning Paradigm for Foundation Model-based Remote Sensing Change Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.01163/) (2023)
- [CASENet: Deep Category-Aware Semantic Edge Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.09759/) (2017)
- [TINYCD: A (Not So) Deep Learning Model For Change Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.13159/) (2022)
- [HANet: A Hierarchical Attention Network for Change Detection With Bitemporal Very-High-Resolution Remote Sensing Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.09178/) (2024)
- [Change Guiding Network: Incorporating Change Prior to Guide Change Detection in Remote Sensing Imagery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.09179/) (2024)
- [Time Travelling Pixels: Bitemporal Features Integration with Foundation Model for Remote Sensing Image Change Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.16202/) (2023)
- [Open-CD: A Comprehensive Toolbox for Change Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.15317/) (2024)
- [Change Detection in Multi-temporal VHR Images Based on Deep Siamese Multi-scale Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.11479/) (2019)
- [JL1-CD: A New Benchmark for Remote Sensing Change Detection and a Robust Multi-Teacher Knowledge Distillation Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13407/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Urban building change detection from bi-temporal aerial imagery is important for redevelopment monitoring, infrastructure management, and unauthorized-construction screening, but Korean urban scenes remain difficult because changed regions are often sparse, appearance varies strongly between acquisition dates, and useful outputs must follow building footprints rather than coarse blobs. This paper presents UrbanCDNet, a task specific Siamese CNN that combines appearance-robust multi-cue comparison, alignment-aware middle-scale differencing, lightweight context refinement, scene calibration, and auxiliary boundary supervision. Experiments use a corrected AIHub-based Korean benchmark with 3,998 training, 503 validation, and 499 test pairs, and report changed-class precision, recall, F1, and IoU. On the locked test split, UrbanCDNet achieves 0.7335 precision, 0.7696 recall, 0.7511 F1, and 0.6014 IoU, outperforming a strong Siamese U-Net baseline (0.7108 F1, 0.5514 IoU) and the strongest external competitor, ChangeFormer-MIT-B0 (0.7107 F1, 0.5512 IoU). Additional diagnostic slicing shows that the gain is concentrated in the operating regimes that motivated the design: on the sparse-change subset with less than 5% changed area, F1 improves from 0.4765 to 0.6175, and on the high photometric-gap subset it improves from 0.6349 to 0.7285. Boundary F1 at 3-pixel tolerance rises from 0.3445 to 0.4447, while object F1 at IoU 0.3 rises from 0.0690 to 0.2258. These results indicate that, on this Korean benchmark, task-shaped temporal comparison and boundary-aware supervision matter more than generic model scale alone