# PerceptionRubrics: Calibrating Multimodal Evaluation to Human Perception

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.28322 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.28322/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 22 of its 44 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 26 Jun 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.06281/) (2023)
- [MM-Vet: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models for Integrated Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.02490/) (2023)
- [Vision Transformers Need Registers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.16588/) (2023)
- [Object Hallucination in Image Captioning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.02156/) (2018)
- [Thinking in Space: How Multimodal Large Language Models See, Remember, and Recall Spaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.14171/) (2024)
- [Rubrics as Rewards: Reinforcement Learning Beyond Verifiable Domains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.17746/) (2025)
- [Skywork-Reward: Bag of Tricks for Reward Modeling in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.18451/) (2024)
- [Analyzing and Mitigating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.00754/) (2023)
- [Inference-Time Scaling for Generalist Reward Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.02495/) (2025)
- [RM-R1: Reward Modeling as Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.02387/) (2025)
- [DOCCI: Descriptions of Connected and Contrasting Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.19753/) (2024)
- [See What You Are Told: Visual Attention Sink in Large Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.03321/) (2025)
- [ResearchRubrics: A Benchmark of Prompts and Rubrics For Evaluating Deep Research Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.07685/) (2025)
- [Benchmarking and Improving Detail Image Caption](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.19092/) (2024)
- [olmOCR 2: Unit Test Rewards for Document OCR](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.19817/) (2025)
- [Online Rubrics Elicitation from Pairwise Comparisons](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.07284/) (2025)
- [GLM-5V-Turbo: Toward a Native Foundation Model for Multimodal Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.26752/) (2026)
- [STEP3-VL-10B Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.09668/) (2026)
- [VisionArena: 230K Real World User-VLM Conversations with Preference Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.08687/) (2024)
- [Perception in Reflection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.07165/) (2025)
- [Mitigating Easy Option Bias in Multiple-Choice Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.13428/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [CAPEval: A Decoupled Caption Evaluation across Understanding and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.02589/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce PerceptionRubrics, a rubric-based evaluation framework that addresses the gap between saturated benchmark scores and real-world brittleness. Shifting evaluation from holistic semantic matching to rigorous atomic auditing, PerceptionRubrics pairs 1,038 information-dense images with over 10,000 instance-specific rubrics. These criteria are derived from golden captions constructed via a novel Circular Peer-Review consensus pipeline and then distilled into a dual-stream system of Must-Right (essential facts) and Easy-Wrong (fine-grained details) rubrics. Crucially, PerceptionRubrics implements a Gated Scoring mechanism: unlike linear averages, failure on mandatory visual facts triggers sharp binary penalties. Extensive evaluation yields critical insights: (1) The Reliability Gap: models often verify fragmented elements correctly yet fail strict conjunctive constraints, exposing brittleness in dense domains; (2) Open-Closed Stratification: contrary to reasoning trends, we reveal a persistent 8% perception deficit between open-source and proprietary frontiers; and (3) Human-Aligned Rigor: our gated metrics substantially out-align conventional benchmarks, validating that strict perceptual fidelity is the prerequisite for reliable generation.
