# Global Explanations for Multivariate Time Series Forecasting Models via K-Order Markov Approximations

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.27599 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.27599/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 20 of its 26 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02391/) (2016)
- [A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07874/) (2017)
- ["Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.04938/) (2016)
- [Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.01365/) (2017)
- [Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Maps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.6034/) (2013)
- [Informer: Beyond Efficient Transformer for Long Sequence Time-Series Forecasting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.07436/) (2020)
- [Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.02685/) (2017)
- [SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noise](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03825/) (2017)
- [Attention is not Explanation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.10186/) (2019)
- [Modeling Long- and Short-Term Temporal Patterns with Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.07015/) (2017)
- [Temporal Fusion Transformers for Interpretable Multi-horizon Time Series Forecasting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.09363/) (2019)
- [Attention is not not Explanation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.04626/) (2019)
- [Benchmarking Deep Learning Interpretability in Time Series Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.13924/) (2020)
- [TimeSHAP: Explaining Recurrent Models through Sequence Perturbations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.00073/) (2020)
- [Explaining Time Series Predictions with Dynamic Masks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.05303/) (2021)
- [Encoding Time-Series Explanations through Self-Supervised Model Behavior Consistency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.02109/) (2023)
- [Clinical Intervention Prediction and Understanding using Deep Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.08498/) (2017)
- [Temporal Dependencies in Feature Importance for Time Series Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.14317/) (2021)
- [Learning Perturbations to Explain Time Series Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18840/) (2023)
- [Explaining Time Series via Contrastive and Locally Sparse Perturbations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.08552/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

While many explainable AI (XAI) methods have been proposed, most are not designed for time-series forecasting models and often rely on the implicit assumption that timestamp features are independent. This assumption ignores the fundamental property of temporal dependence and can lead to explanations that violate the sequential and causal structure of the data. We introduce textscKARMA, a method for explaining time-series predictors by constructing a Markov surrogate model that captures the temporal dependencies learned by the predictor. Our approach revolves around three main aspects: identifying the minimal history length K that is predictively sufficient for the model, estimating the best-fitting K-order Markov transition kernel from the discretized history space, and a five-level global explanation hierarchy that can be derived from the Markov transition kernel, which we illustrate using real-world weather data (Beijing PM 2.5). We also certify using complex synthetic data with known true causal edges that KARMA (i) recovers the data causal structure as learned by the model via a controlled experiment and (ii) identifies temporal dependencies better than established attribution methods such as TimeSHAP.
