# Position: The Term "Machine Unlearning" Is Overused in LLMs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.27379 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.27379/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security.
- Builds on 57 of its 66 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 May 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM safety and security / [Machine unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/safety/machine-unlearning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 57)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.06261/) (2025)
- [Certified Data Removal from Machine Learning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.03030/) (2019)
- [TOFU: A Task of Fictitious Unlearning for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06121/) (2024)
- [The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.03218/) (2024)
- [Negative Preference Optimization: From Catastrophic Collapse to Effective Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.05868/) (2024)
- [Neural Text Generation with Unlikelihood Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.04319/) (2019)
- [Making AI Forget You: Data Deletion in Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.05012/) (2019)
- [Knowledge Unlearning for Mitigating Privacy Risks in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.01504/) (2022)
- [Improving Alignment and Robustness with Circuit Breakers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.04313/) (2024)
- [Descent-to-Delete: Gradient-Based Methods for Machine Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.02923/) (2020)
- [Large Language Model Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.10683/) (2023)
- [MUSE: Machine Unlearning Six-Way Evaluation for Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.06460/) (2024)
- [Approximate Data Deletion from Machine Learning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.10077/) (2020)
- [In-Context Unlearning: Language Models as Few Shot Unlearners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.07579/) (2023)
- [Simplicity Prevails: Rethinking Negative Preference Optimization for LLM Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.07163/) (2024)
- [On the Necessity of Auditable Algorithmic Definitions for Machine Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.11891/) (2021)
- [Eight Methods to Evaluate Robust Unlearning in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.16835/) (2024)
- [Machine Unlearning via Algorithmic Stability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.13179/) (2021)
- [An Adversarial Perspective on Machine Unlearning for AI Safety](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.18025/) (2024)
- [Large Language Model Unlearning via Embedding-Corrupted Prompts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.07933/) (2024)
- [Guardrail Baselines for Unlearning in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.03329/) (2024)
- [Reversing the Forget-Retain Objectives: An Efficient LLM Unlearning Framework from Logit Difference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.08607/) (2024)
- [Catastrophic Failure of LLM Unlearning via Quantization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.16454/) (2024)
- [Position: LLM Unlearning Benchmarks are Weak Measures of Progress](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.02879/) (2024)
- [A Closer Look at Machine Unlearning for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.08109/) (2024)
- [LLM Unlearning via Neural Activation Redirection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.07218/) (2025)
- [Machine Unlearning Fails to Remove Data Poisoning Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.17216/) (2024)
- [SafeEraser: Enhancing Safety in Multimodal Large Language Models through Multimodal Machine Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.12520/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Memory as a cache: Exact context reuse and deletion by construction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.32395/) (2026)
- [Causal Routing for Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.34475/) (2026)
- [TULIP: Targeted LLM Unlearning at Layers Identified Per-Input](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.34591/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models increasingly face demands to "forget" training data, knowledge, or behaviors due to regulatory deletion obligations, copyright/licensing disputes, and safety or product-policy requirements. This position paper argues that machine unlearning is overused as a term in LLM research and should be reserved for dataset-defined deletion: removing the training influence of a precisely specified forget set such that the resulting model is approximately indistinguishable from retraining without that data. We contend that many tasks currently labeled "unlearning" (e.g., refusal for harmful requests, entity/knowledge removal, or targeted suppression) pursue different, often policy-dependent objectives and therefore require different terminology and baselines (e.g., alignment, suppression, editing, obfuscation). We further argue that this confusion is not cosmetic: because papers make different implicit guarantees under the same label, metrics and benchmarks are frequently reused outside their intended scope, rewarding surface-level non-disclosure (e.g., low ROUGE/forget accuracy) even when retraining-equivalence is not tested and derived capabilities remain. We conclude by calling for stricter terminology tied to explicit guarantees and reference models, and for evaluations that match the claimed objective.