# Automating Potential-based Reward Shaping with Vision Language Model Guidance

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.27180 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.27180/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Embodied and 3D vision-language models, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 27 of its 45 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2026.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [Embodied and 3D vision-language models](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/embodied-and-3d-vision-language-models/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 27 of 27)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actor](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.01290/) (2018)
- [Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03741/) (2017)
- [D4RL: Datasets for Deep Data-Driven Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.07219/) (2020)
- [Meta-World: A Benchmark and Evaluation for Multi-Task and Meta Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10897/) (2019)
- [Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.09482/) (2017)
- [Relay Policy Learning: Solving Long-Horizon Tasks via Imitation and Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.11956/) (2019)
- [PEBBLE: Feedback-Efficient Interactive Reinforcement Learning via Relabeling Experience and Unsupervised Pre-training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.05091/) (2021)
- [LIV: Language-Image Representations and Rewards for Robotic Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.00958/) (2023)
- [Vision-Language Models are Zero-Shot Reward Models for Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.12921/) (2023)
- [RL-VLM-F: Reinforcement Learning from Vision Language Foundation Model Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03681/) (2024)
- [RoboCLIP: One Demonstration is Enough to Learn Robot Policies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.07899/) (2023)
- [Learning to Utilize Shaping Rewards: A New Approach of Reward Shaping](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.02669/) (2020)
- [Keeping Your Distance: Solving Sparse Reward Tasks Using Self-Balancing Shaped Rewards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.01417/) (2019)
- [Can Foundation Models Perform Zero-Shot Task Specification For Robot Manipulation?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.11134/) (2022)
- [Vision-Language Models as a Source of Rewards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.09187/) (2023)
- [Self-Supervised Online Reward Shaping in Sparse-Reward Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.04529/) (2021)
- [Accelerating Reinforcement Learning of Robotic Manipulations via Feedback from Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.02379/) (2023)
- [Enhancing Rating-Based Reinforcement Learning to Effectively Leverage Feedback from Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.12822/) (2025)
- [Shaping Rewards for Reinforcement Learning with Imperfect Demonstrations using Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.01298/) (2020)
- [On the Modeling Capabilities of Large Language Models for Sequential Decision Making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.05656/) (2024)
- [Improving the Effectiveness of Potential-Based Reward Shaping in Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.01307/) (2025)
- [Navigating Noisy Feedback: Enhancing Reinforcement Learning with Error-Prone Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.17389/) (2024)
- [Improving Sample Efficiency of Reinforcement Learning with Background Knowledge from Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.03964/) (2024)
- [Training-free Generation of Temporally Consistent Rewards from VLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.04789/) (2025)
- [D-Shape: Demonstration-Shaped Reinforcement Learning via Goal Conditioning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.14428/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [A Unified Framework for Dynamic Reward Shaping in Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.08158/) (2026)
- [World Potential Model: Pretrained World Knowledge as Progress Potentials](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.09560/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Sparse rewards are inherently challenging for reinforcement learning agents as they lack intermediate feedback to guide exploration and to correctly attribute the sparse success rewards to relevant parts of the trajectory. Naive reward shaping can induce reward hacking, yielding policies that exploit auxiliary signals instead of solving the intended task. Potential-based reward shaping (PBRS) guarantees preservation of the optimal policy set, but requires the definition of a heuristic potential function over the state space. In this work, we introduce the VLM-guided PBRS framework VLM-PBRS that learns the potential function directly from vision language model (VLM) feedback. We query a lightweight VLM to obtain preferences over image pairs and train a model of the potential function using these preferences. As this approach is based on potential-based reward shaping, it preserves the original optimal policies, and removes the need for expert-designed reward shaping terms. Because large VLMs are prohibitively expensive to invoke repeatedly during policy learning, we employ smaller, more computationally efficient VLMs. Although the resulting preference labels are less accurate, empirical evidence shows that the preference labels can still be used to accelerate learning. We validate our method empirically in the Meta-World and Franka Kitchen environments and highlight the connection between VLM preference label accuracy and sample efficiency improvements. Our contributions are threefold: (1) the first application of VLM preference-based learning to synthesize a potential function for PBRS, (2) a principled, low-cost solution that leverages small VLMs, and (3) extensive empirical demonstration of improved sample efficiency and robustness to reward hacking.
