# Risk-Aware Selective Multimodal Driver Monitoring with Driver-State World Modeling

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.26922 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.26922/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in World models for autonomous driving, one of 11 directions in World models.
- Builds on 21 of its 33 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2026.

## Placed in

- World models / [World models for autonomous driving](https://mlsanity.com/wm/world-models-for-autonomous-driving/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.02531/) (2015)
- [BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.12597/) (2023)
- [Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.14198/) (2022)
- [Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12191/) (2024)
- [InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.06500/) (2023)
- [World Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.10122/) (2018)
- [WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shifts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.07421/) (2020)
- [Learning Latent Dynamics for Planning from Pixels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.04551/) (2018)
- [Mastering Diverse Domains through World Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.04104/) (2023)
- [Selective Classification for Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.08500/) (2017)
- [GAIA-1: A Generative World Model for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.17080/) (2023)
- [Revisiting Feature Prediction for Learning Visual Representations from Video](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.08471/) (2024)
- [TD-MPC2: Scalable, Robust World Models for Continuous Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.16828/) (2023)
- [SelectiveNet: A Deep Neural Network with an Integrated Reject Option](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.09192/) (2019)
- [Conformal Risk Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.02814/) (2022)
- [Consistent Estimators for Learning to Defer to an Expert](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.01862/) (2020)
- [Predict Responsibly: Improving Fairness and Accuracy by Learning to Defer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.06664/) (2017)
- [Deep Gamblers: Learning to Abstain with Portfolio Theory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.00208/) (2019)
- [DMD: A Large-Scale Multi-Modal Driver Monitoring Dataset for Attention and Alertness Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.12085/) (2020)
- [Driver-WM: A Driver-Centric Traffic-Conditioned Latent World Model for In-Cabin Dynamics Rollout](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.05092/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [DriveMotion: A Large-Scale Multi-Source Benchmark for Driver Motion Sequence Modeling and Forecasting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.08117/) (2026)
- [Uncertainty Quantification for LLM Agents: A Taxonomy, an Evaluation Protocol, and an Empirical Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.07395/) (2026)
- [TriDrive: Joint Driver, Vehicle, and Road Modeling for Forecasting and Driver Monitoring](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.33000/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Continuous driver monitoring in automated vehicles requires low-latency inference while avoiding unsafe decisions under uncertain driver states. Large vision-language models provide broad multimodal priors, but their latency and limited reliability in this setting make them unsuitable as always-on in-cabin monitors. We propose a cost-aware selective inference framework for deployable multimodal driver monitoring. The core system is a lightweight RGB-physiological student that combines in-cabin visual observations with window-level HR/EDA signals, and a learned gate that decides when to accept the fast prediction or abstain for safety intervention. Additional controls show that the learned scores contain sample-level information beyond scenario priors, while exact physiological synchronization remains a limitation. To incorporate predictive evidence, we further study a compact driver-state world modeling module that rolls out latent driver-state features and estimates future fast-model errors and counterfactual system-level action costs. On scenario-induced driver-demand recognition, the RGB-physiological student improves over RGB-only and physiology-only baselines, reaching 0.7440 Macro-F1 and 0.9099 balanced accuracy with 11.39M parameters and 3.08ms inference latency. Cost-aware selective inference reduces unsafe false negatives from 17.37% under always-fast inference to approximately 5% across seeds, while maintaining deployment-level latency. While driver-state world modeling offers valuable predictive signals, worst-group evaluations highlight persistent operating-point calibration drift. Ultimately, reliable edge driver monitoring requires advancing not only perception backbones, but also risk-aware selective control and group-robust calibration.