# State-specific respiratory signatures for affective and stress recognition: Interpretable respiratory markers, autocorrelation lags, and compact CNN models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.26723 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.26723/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 2 of its 60 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [A Comparison of Personalized and Generalized Approaches to Emotion Recognition Using Consumer Wearable Devices: Machine Learning Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.14245/) (2023)
- [FEG-Pro: Forecast-Error Growth Profiling for Finite-Horizon Instability Analysis of Nonlinear Time Series](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.17282/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Respiratory activity is a direct and interpretable physiological channel for wearable stress and affective-state recognition, yet many studies emphasize classification accuracy without identifying which respiratory properties separate different states. Using the chest respiratory channel of the WESAD dataset, we analyze 60 s windows under leave-one-subject-out validation and combine two complementary branches: compact raw-signal one-dimensional convolutional neural networks (1D-CNNs) and physically grouped handcrafted respiratory signatures. The primary task is stress versus non-stress detection, while baseline, stress, amusement, and meditation are additionally analyzed in a one-vs-rest setting to reveal state-specific respiratory markers. The feature space is organized into respiratory timing, breath-to-breath variability, waveform statistics, spectral/time-frequency descriptors, and autocorrelation/nonlinear predictability descriptors, with the raw 60 s signal treated as a sixth representation for the CNN branch. We introduce autocorrelation transition lags (Zpm/Zmp) as interpretable markers of respiratory correlation scale and separately evaluate exploratory forecast-error-growth/Lyapunov-like descriptors. In the final CNN refit setting, the raw-signal model achieved the strongest stress-vs-rest performance (accuracy 96.72%, macro-F1 95.30%, MCC 90.61%). In contrast, compact feature models were stronger for baseline (MCC 65.34%), amusement (MCC 35.69%), and especially meditation (MCC 88.65%). Strict nested reanalysis of the auxiliary Top-20 stress search yielded mean MCC=82.29% versus 85.45% originally, indicating modest selection optimism. These results show that CNNs are most useful for the practical stress detector, whereas interpretable respiratory signatures provide stronger and more physiologically transparent state-specific markers for several non-stress conditions.