# EVOM: Agentic Meta-Evolution of Actor-Critic Architectures for Reinforcement Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.26327 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.26327/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 5 of its 37 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/agents/general-llm-agent-frameworks-and-benchmarks/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [OpenAI Gym](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.01540/) (2016)
- [Evolution Strategies as a Scalable Alternative to Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.03864/) (2017)
- [Deep Neuroevolution: Genetic Algorithms Are a Competitive Alternative for Training Deep Neural Networks for Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.06567/) (2017)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Recursive Self-Improvement in AI: From Bounded Self-Refinement to Autonomous Research Loops](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.07663/) (2026)
- [Evolutionary Intelligence for Scientific Discovery: From Evolutionary Computation to Cumulative Discovery Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.09025/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In actor-critic reinforcement learning, network architectures are typically manually designed. Automating this design is challenging because each candidate must be trained before evaluation, and the design space is open-ended. To address these challenges, we introduce EVOM, an agentic meta-evolution framework for discovering high-performance actor-critic architectures. We frame architecture search as a bi-level optimization: an inner loop trains weights via the low-fidelity proximal policy optimization (PPO), while an outer loop drives meta-evolution by iteratively refining architecture programs. Crucially, this outer loop is powered by an LLM-based design agent that operates purely as an architecture designer, completely decoupled from policy execution and environment control. Experiments reveal that EVOM outperforms the manually designed baseline, an LLM-guided random search, and the state-of-the-art LLM-guided programmatic policy search method MLES, delivering superior performance on Ant-v4 and HalfCheetah-v4. Ablation studies validate that both the meta-evolution loop and the LLM Design Agent are indispensable for final performance.