# Assessing Distribution Shift in Human Activity Recognition for Domain Generalization

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.24781 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.24781/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 32 of its 80 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 23 Jun 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 32)

- [mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.09412/) (2017)
- [Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.07818/) (2015)
- [Invariant Risk Minimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.02893/) (2019)
- [WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shifts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.07421/) (2020)
- [Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.08731/) (2019)
- [Deep CORAL: Correlation Alignment for Deep Domain Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.01719/) (2016)
- [In Search of Lost Domain Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.01434/) (2020)
- [Generalizing to Unseen Domains: A Survey on Domain Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03097/) (2021)
- [Learning to Generalize: Meta-Learning for Domain Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.03463/) (2017)
- [Out-of-Distribution Generalization via Risk Extrapolation (REx)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.00688/) (2020)
- [Gradient Starvation: A Learning Proclivity in Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.09468/) (2020)
- [Gradient Matching for Domain Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.09937/) (2021)
- [Invariance Principle Meets Information Bottleneck for Out-of-Distribution Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.06607/) (2021)
- [Cross-Domain Weakly-Supervised Object Detection through Progressive Domain Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.11365/) (2018)
- [Simultaneous Deep Transfer Across Domains and Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1510.02192/) (2015)
- [SelfReg: Self-supervised Contrastive Regularization for Domain Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.09841/) (2021)
- [Improve Unsupervised Domain Adaptation with Mixup Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.00677/) (2020)
- [Adaptive Risk Minimization: Learning to Adapt to Domain Shift](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.02931/) (2020)
- [Domain Generalization by Marginal Transfer Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.07910/) (2017)
- [Learning explanations that are hard to vary](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.00329/) (2020)
- [Domain Generalization for Medical Imaging Classification with Linear-Dependency Regularization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.12829/) (2020)
- [Learning from Extrinsic and Intrinsic Supervisions for Domain Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.09316/) (2020)
- [Model-Based Domain Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.11436/) (2021)
- [Probable Domain Generalization via Quantile Risk Minimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.09944/) (2022)
- [When is invariance useful in an Out-of-Distribution Generalization problem ?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.01883/) (2020)
- [SAND-mask: An Enhanced Gradient Masking Strategy for the Discovery of Invariances in Domain Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.02266/) (2021)
- [Quantifying and Improving Transferability in Domain Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.03632/) (2021)
- [Invariant Causal Mechanisms through Distribution Matching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.11646/) (2022)
- [Semantic-Discriminative Mixup for Generalizable Sensor-based Cross-domain Activity Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.06629/) (2022)
- [Deep Transfer Learning for Cross-domain Activity Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.07963/) (2018)

## Abstract (arXiv)

While the field of Human Activity Recognition (HAR) continues to draw interest from researchers and advance in important ways, some key challenges remain. One of the most difficult aspects of building HAR models that show good performance in real-world settings is dealing with data diversity from device and sensor heterogeneity, and contextual changes that are intrinsic to real-world applications. While data diversity in HAR has been well-acknowledged in the literature, there remains a gap in understanding the effect of various types of distribution shifts on HAR models and the domain generalization problem that arises. Towards that end, this paper systematically evaluates 4 different types of distribution shifts, including variations in device type, sensor placement, sampling rate, and user behavior. Quantifying their effects, we illustrate that diversity shifts predominantly define all types of shifts, indicating the existence of unique features that are not shared across different domains. We then introduce a uniform HAR-based distribution shift benchmarks and conduct a comprehensive evaluation of up to 28 domain generalization methods. Our analysis exposes the limitations of current domain generalization algorithms in achieving model generalizability, marginally outperforming the empirical risk minimization baseline. This work represents the first systematic exploration of domain generalization and adaptation concerning specific distribution shifts in sensor-based HAR, offering an open-source benchmark platform and datasets to spur further research.