# Language-Specific Sentiment Polarity Biases in Encoder and Large Language Model Classification of Product Reviews

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.22745 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.22745/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 5 of its 17 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 22 Jun 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [DeBERTaV3: Improving DeBERTa using ELECTRA-Style Pre-Training with Gradient-Disentangled Embedding Sharing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.09543/) (2021)
- [XNLI: Evaluating Cross-lingual Sentence Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.05053/) (2018)
- [How multilingual is Multilingual BERT?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.01502/) (2019)
- [The Model Arena for Cross-lingual Sentiment Analysis: A Comparative Study in the Era of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.19358/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This study investigates sentiment polarity biases, specifically, differences in how accurately AI models classify positive versus negative reviews across languages and model architectures. Large language models show a negative bias in French and are more accurate on negative reviews, while encoder models exhibit positive bias in Japanese, missing negative reviews that use indirect criticism. These language-specific polarity biases have implications in both social and business domains deploying multilingual sentiment analysis systems.