# SCENIC: Semantic-Conditioned Edge-Aware Neural Framework for Structured IoT Command Generation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.22296 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.22296/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 24 of its 30 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10683/) (2019)
- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.08361/) (2020)
- [Qwen2.5 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.15115/) (2024)
- [Qwen Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.16609/) (2023)
- [Supervised Contrastive Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.11362/) (2020)
- [Qwen2 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.10671/) (2024)
- [Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.02626/) (2015)
- [ChatGLM: A Family of Large Language Models from GLM-130B to GLM-4 All Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12793/) (2024)
- [A Simple and Effective Pruning Approach for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.11695/) (2023)
- [To prune, or not to prune: exploring the efficacy of pruning for model compression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.01878/) (2017)
- [Importance Estimation for Neural Network Pruning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.10771/) (2019)
- [A Contrastive Framework for Neural Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.06417/) (2022)
- [Accelerating Sparse Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08378/) (2021)
- [A Review on Edge Large Language Models: Design, Execution, and Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.11845/) (2024)
- [Contrastive Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.11138/) (2024)
- [HomeBench: Evaluating LLMs in Smart Homes with Valid and Invalid Instructions Across Single and Multiple Devices](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.19628/) (2025)
- [SAGE: Smart home Agent with Grounded Execution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.00772/) (2023)
- [On-Device LLMs for Home Assistant: Dual Role in Intent Detection and Response Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.12923/) (2025)
- [Dataset: Analysis of IFTTT Recipes to Study How Humans Use Internet-of-Things (IoT) Devices](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.00068/) (2021)
- [Large Language Models in the IoT Ecosystem -- A Survey on Security Challenges and Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.17586/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Edge Internet of Things (IoT) agents are often constrained by memory capacity, privacy requirements, communication latency, and recurring inference cost. Current smart-home assistants commonly rely on API-level command interfaces or cloud-based language models that remain difficult to deploy on edge devices. This paper addresses edge IoT command generation as a many-to-one structured output task, where multiple natural-language instructions map to the same canonical command string for deterministic smart-home parsing. To support this setting, we propose Semantic-Conditioned Edge-Aware Neural Framework for Structured IoT Command Generation (SCENIC), an end-to-end framework covering model architecture selection, Smart Home Instruct data generation, triplet-loss contrastive supervised fine-tuning, pruning and quantization, and deployment-oriented export. We evaluate sub-0.2B-scale transformer backbones, which are, to the best of our knowledge, among the smallest language-model backbones studied for edge IoT structured command generation. On Smart Home Instruct-Bench, the strongest dense decoder-only row reaches 99.0% EM@1, while the encoder-decoder model retains stronger high-sparsity behavior. A representative pruned INT8 encoder-decoder export preserves 91.0% EM@1 and 99.0% EM@5 while reducing exported model size by 25.38%. TensorRT profiling of the NVIDIA 2:4 sparse encoder export further shows up to 1.8x encoder-component speedup, indicating that the selected encoder-decoder deployment path can retain structured command accuracy under edge-oriented compression while hardware acceleration evidence remains component-level. The SCENIC code and experimental artifacts are open sourced to support reproducibility.