# Structural Assessment for Understanding and Guiding Dataset Distillation in Discrete Token Space

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.21705 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.21705/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 39 of its 52 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 19 Jun 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 39)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.10752/) (2021)
- [DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.07193/) (2023)
- [Scalable Diffusion Models with Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.09748/) (2022)
- [Neural Discrete Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.00937/) (2017)
- [SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.01952/) (2023)
- [Taming Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.09841/) (2020)
- [EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.00029/) (2017)
- [Contrastive Multiview Coding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.05849/) (2019)
- [Visual Autoregressive Modeling: Scalable Image Generation via Next-Scale Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.02905/) (2024)
- [Remote Sensing Image Scene Classification: Benchmark and State of the Art](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.00121/) (2017)
- [Dataset Condensation with Gradient Matching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.05929/) (2020)
- [Dataset Distillation by Matching Training Trajectories](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11932/) (2022)
- [Dataset Condensation with Distribution Matching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.04181/) (2021)
- [BEiT v2: Masked Image Modeling with Vector-Quantized Visual Tokenizers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.06366/) (2022)
- [Dataset Condensation via Efficient Synthetic-Data Parameterization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.14959/) (2022)
- [Dataset Distillation using Neural Feature Regression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.00719/) (2022)
- [Squeeze, Recover and Relabel: Dataset Condensation at ImageNet Scale From A New Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.13092/) (2023)
- [Dataset Distillation: A Comprehensive Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.07014/) (2023)
- [Generalizing Dataset Distillation via Deep Generative Prior](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.01649/) (2023)
- [A Comprehensive Survey of Dataset Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.05603/) (2023)
- [On the Diversity and Realism of Distilled Dataset: An Efficient Dataset Distillation Paradigm](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.03526/) (2023)
- [DREAM: Efficient Dataset Distillation by Representative Matching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.14416/) (2023)
- [Efficient Dataset Distillation via Minimax Diffusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.15529/) (2023)
- [D4M: Dataset Distillation via Disentangled Diffusion Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.15138/) (2024)
- [Dataset Distillation with Neural Characteristic Function: A Minmax Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.20653/) (2025)
- [Dataset Distillation via the Wasserstein Metric](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.18531/) (2023)
- [Dataset Distillation via Vision-Language Category Prototype](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.23580/) (2025)
- [Taming Diffusion for Dataset Distillation with High Representativeness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.18399/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [REDI: Corpus Aware Patch Ranking for DINOv3 Token Reduction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.31676/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Dataset distillation (DD) has proven to reduce training cost while preserving accuracy. While promising, the factors that make one distilled dataset more effective than another remain poorly understood. In this work, we investigate this question through the lens of discrete visual tokenizers. Whereas many prior DD efforts emphasize matching global data distributions, we suggest that the effectiveness depends on which semantic concepts are captured and how they are composed. Discrete visual tokenizers provide a finite vocabulary that enables direct statistical analysis of such compositional structure. Through quantitative analysis of token-level statistics, we introduce the structural score to measure the adequacy of token compositions. We observe that distilled datasets with balanced token composition yield higher validation performance. On the other hand, divergence from the original data does not necessarily harm performance. We further show that samples with high structural scores in the discrete token space can effectively guide diffusion-based DD. Our findings highlight the importance of token composition in dataset effectiveness, offering a principled complement to distributional similarity considerations in DD.