# Clinical Term Extraction using Open-Source Small Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.21689 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.21689/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 2 of its 9 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 19 Jun 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10683/) (2019)
- [BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.08746/) (2019)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Clinical information for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) care documented in unstructured clinical notes limits downstream analysis without extraction into structured formats. Open-source small language models with few-shot prompting for detecting the presence of ALS-relevant clinical terms in patient documentation were evaluated without task-specific training data. The detection task targeted 17 categories spanning functional scores, respiratory measures, medications, and related clinical and non-clinical attributes. Clinical note content was normalized from JSON-encoded discharge summaries and processed with a prompt template having structured JSON outputs. We compared 26 open-source models using aggregate, label-level, and manual-validation multilabel classification metrics. Manual validation showed that a regex rule baseline had higher overall micro-F1 and lower Hamming loss than any single SLM or TF-IDF baseline, while Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 was the highest-performing SLM by micro-F1. Model rankings varied by metric and label category, with the TF-IDF baseline showing high recall but low precision, some SLMs showing higher precision but lower recall, and Hammer2.1-7b showing strong performance for ALSFRS-R subscore detection. These findings support targeted hybrid extraction workflows rather than replacement of existing rule-based methods.