# Neurosymbolic Clinical Trial Matching via LLM-Driven Abduction and Logical Verification

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.20895 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.20895/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 19 of its 51 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 19 of 19)

- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.11916/) (2022)
- [Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04761/) (2023)
- [Qwen3-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.21631/) (2025)
- [BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.08746/) (2019)
- [ColBERT: Efficient and Effective Passage Search via Contextualized Late Interaction over BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.12832/) (2020)
- [ClinicalBERT: Modeling Clinical Notes and Predicting Hospital Readmission](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.05342/) (2019)
- [Logic-LM: Empowering Large Language Models with Symbolic Solvers for Faithful Logical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.12295/) (2023)
- [SatLM: Satisfiability-Aided Language Models Using Declarative Prompting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.09656/) (2023)
- [Matching Patients to Clinical Trials with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.15051/) (2023)
- [Verification and Refinement of Natural Language Explanations through LLM-Symbolic Theorem Proving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.01379/) (2024)
- [Scaling Clinical Trial Matching Using Large Language Models: A Case Study in Oncology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.02180/) (2023)
- [SemEval-2024 Task 2: Safe Biomedical Natural Language Inference for Clinical Trials](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.04963/) (2024)
- [Improving Chain-of-Thought Reasoning via Quasi-Symbolic Abstractions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.12616/) (2025)
- [DiReCT: Diagnostic Reasoning for Clinical Notes via Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.01933/) (2024)
- [SemEval-2023 Task 7: Multi-Evidence Natural Language Inference for Clinical Trial Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.02993/) (2023)
- [Adaptive LLM-Symbolic Reasoning via Dynamic Logical Solver Composition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.06774/) (2025)
- [A Survey on LLM-Assisted Clinical Trial Recruitment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.15301/) (2025)
- [Leveraging LLMs for Structured Data Extraction from Unstructured Patient Records](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.13700/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a promising path to automate Clinical Trial Matching (CTM), but still struggle with the deterministic verification required for complex eligibility criteria. Conversely, purely symbolic methods provide formal rigour but break down when faced with incomplete patient records and noisy clinical evidence. To bridge this gap, we investigate a hybrid framework for CTM combining LLMs with logical verification. In particular, we introduce an abductive neurosymbolic CTM framework (αNeSy-CTM), which leverages the linguistic and world knowledge in LLMs to support reasoning over noisy and underspecified clinical text. Extensive evaluation demonstrates that αNeSy-CTM substantially outperforms standalone LLM baselines, achieving up to 30% relative improvement over zero-shot baselines. In addition, our analyses confirm the impact of abductive reasoning on CTM, with αNeSy-CTM exhibiting improved accuracy, specificity, and robustness over a non-abductive neurosymbolic setting. Furthermore, αNeSy-CTM and Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning prove highly complementary, highlighting the potential for a hybrid routing policy. Ultimately, this paper demonstrates the impact of neurosymbolic methods for automating CTM, providing a path toward the next generation of auditable, LLM-driven clinical applications.
