# ScholarQuest: A Taxonomy-Guided Benchmark for Agentic Academic Paper Search in Open Literature Environments

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.20235 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.20235/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 7 of its 19 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Web, search, and research agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/web-search-and-research-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Search-R1: Training LLMs to Reason and Leverage Search Engines with Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.09516/) (2025)
- [PaSa: An LLM Agent for Comprehensive Academic Paper Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.10120/) (2025)
- [PaperArena: An Evaluation Benchmark for Tool-Augmented Agentic Reasoning on Scientific Literature](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.10909/) (2025)
- [SPAR: Scholar Paper Retrieval with LLM-based Agents for Enhanced Academic Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.15245/) (2025)
- [PaperScout: An Autonomous Agent for Academic Paper Search with Process-Aware Sequence-Level Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.10029/) (2026)
- [DeepXiv-SDK: An Agentic Data Interface for Scientific Literature](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.00084/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Academic paper search is a core step in scientific research, and LLM-based search agents are emerging as a promising paradigm for iterative, intent-driven literature exploration. However, existing benchmarks offer limited coverage of research intents and insufficient support for scalable answer construction and reproducible multi-turn evaluation. We propose ScholarQuest, a taxonomy-guided benchmark constructed from over 1,000 computer science topics and organized around four research intents. To construct answer sets at scale, we combine multi-source retrieval, citation expansion, and multi-stage relevance adjudication. We further build textitScholarBase, a million-scale literature environment with unified retrieval and citation-expansion interfaces, together with a shared multi-turn search harness. We benchmark complete literature search systems and compare language models within this harness, evaluating retrieval coverage, search efficiency, and robustness across research intents. Results show that agentic methods outperform single-shot retrieval baselines, yet the best-performing search system achieves only 0.312 Recall@100 and 0.352 Recall@All. Comparisons under the shared harness reveal intent-dependent model strengths, with higher Planner token consumption not consistently yielding higher recall. We release the benchmark, retrieval backend, and evaluation harness for reproducible research