# Beyond Entropy: Learning from Token-Level Distributional Deviations for LLM Reasoning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.19771 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.19771/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 29 of its 48 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reinforcement learning for reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reinforcement-learning-for-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 29 of 29)

- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12948/) (2025)
- [Let's Verify Step by Step](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.20050/) (2023)
- [GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.12022/) (2023)
- [DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.14476/) (2025)
- [OpenAI o1 System Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.16720/) (2024)
- [DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.19437/) (2024)
- [Safe RLHF: Safe Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.12773/) (2023)
- [Beyond the 80/20 Rule: High-Entropy Minority Tokens Drive Effective Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.01939/) (2025)
- [Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning in Large Language Models with One Training Example](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.20571/) (2025)
- [AceReason-Nemotron: Advancing Math and Code Reasoning through Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.16400/) (2025)
- [Critical Tokens Matter: Token-Level Contrastive Estimation Enhances LLM's Reasoning Capability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.19943/) (2024)
- [Rethinking Entropy Interventions in RLVR: An Entropy Change Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.10150/) (2025)
- [Demystifying Reasoning Dynamics with Mutual Information: Thinking Tokens are Information Peaks in LLM Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.02867/) (2025)
- [Do Not Let Low-Probability Tokens Over-Dominate in RL for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.12929/) (2025)
- [Reinforcement Learning Meets Large Language Models: A Survey of Advancements and Applications Across the LLM Lifecycle](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.16679/) (2025)
- [Rethinking Entropy Regularization in Large Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.25133/) (2025)
- [Revisiting Entropy in Reinforcement Learning for Large Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.05993/) (2025)
- [Enhancing Large Language Model Reasoning via Selective Critical Token Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.10974/) (2025)
- [Sparse but Critical: A Token-Level Analysis of Distributional Shifts in RLVR Fine-Tuning of LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.22446/) (2026)
- [KTAE: A Model-Free Algorithm to Key-Tokens Advantage Estimation in Mathematical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.16826/) (2025)
- [SCOPE-RL: Stable and Quantitative Control of Policy Entropy in RL Post-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.08141/) (2025)
- [Revisiting Entropy Regularization: Adaptive Coefficient Unlocks Its Potential for LLM Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.10959/) (2025)
- [Top-H Decoding: Adapting the Creativity and Coherence with Bounded Entropy in Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.02510/) (2025)
- [STAPO: Stabilizing Reinforcement Learning for LLMs by Silencing Rare Spurious Tokens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.15620/) (2026)
- [Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Semantic and Token Entropy for LLM Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.04359/) (2025)
- [Less is More: Improving LLM Reasoning with Minimal Test-Time Intervention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.13940/) (2025)
- [Entropy-Guided Token Dropout: Training Autoregressive Language Models with Limited Domain Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.23422/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [GRPODropout: Less is More for Online Reinforcement Learning Rollouts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.11854/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has significantly advanced Large Language Model (LLM) reasoning; however, it faces a fundamental optimization instability: uniform token updates precipitate entropy collapse, leading to premature convergence to suboptimal strategies, whereas excessive Shannon Entropy maximization can cause entropy explosion, driving blind exploration toward incoherent reasoning chains. To resolve this dichotomy, we introduce the Independent Combinatorial Tokens (ICT) framework, which shifts the optimization focus from scalar uncertainty to the distributional properties of token logits. By leveraging the Jensen-Shannon (JS) divergence between token logits distributions, ICT identifies tokens with distinctive distributional patterns as critical branching points for guiding effective exploration in LLM reasoning. Our theoretical analysis, grounded in both Shannon and second-order R'enyi entropy, proves that selectively updating on these tokens regulates policy concentration: it reduces the overall distribution uncertainty measured by Shannon entropy, while controlling probability concentration captured by second-order R'enyi entropy. This dual effect prevents over-concentrated token generation from weakening exploration and effectively stabilizes the training landscape. Empirical results demonstrate that updating only the top 10% of unique tokens on Qwen2.5 (0.5B/1.5B/7B) models yields an average pass@4 improvement of 4.58%, with a maximum gain of 14.9%, over GRPO, 20-Entropy, and STAPO baselines across seven benchmarks spanning math, commonsense, and Olympiad-level problems.