# PhantomSkill: Malicious Code Injection in Agent Skill Ecosystems

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.19191 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.19191/

## Key facts

- Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 3 of its 9 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Agent threats, guardrails and governance](https://mlsanity.com/agents/agent-threats-guardrails-and-governance/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.12173/) (2023)
- [Skill-Inject: Measuring Agent Vulnerability to Skill File Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.20156/) (2026)
- [Supply-Chain Poisoning Attacks Against LLM Coding Agent Skill Ecosystems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.03081/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Cloak and Detonate: Scanner Evasion and Dynamic Detection of Agent Skill Malware](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.02357/) (2026)
- [CompoSkill: Compositional Skill Chain Attacks from Individually Scanner-Passing LLM Agent Skills](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.16246/) (2026)
- [SkillSentry: Adaptive Honey Worlds for Dynamic Safety Testing of Agent Skills](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.03485/) (2026)
- [Towards a Systems Foundation for Agentic Skills: Architecture, Lifecycle, and Security](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.29596/) (2026)
- [APEX: Active Protection at Execution Boundaries for LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.06966/) (2026)
- [Encrypted Skills Can Become New Security Exploits If AI Agents Know How to Decipher](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.18262/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Agent skills allow LLM-based coding agents to acquire domain-specific capabilities from third-party packages, but they also introduce a new supply-chain attack surface. We present PhantomSkill, an attack framework that hides malicious behavior in a skill's auxiliary resources rather than in its textual description. Its core technique, VulMask, rewrites overt malicious scripts into vulnerability-shaped implementations whose malicious behavior is activated only under attacker-controlled trigger conditions. This design shifts the visible signal from explicit malicious intent to ordinary-looking insecure code. Across representative host skills, attack goals, coding agents, generation models, and automated reviewers, VulMask preserves benign utility while reducing warning and malware-level detection compared with overt malicious scripts. Our results show that skill ecosystems require resource-level vetting, execution-time containment, and security policies that treat exploitable vulnerabilities in agent skills as potential malicious payloads.