# Learning from Own Solutions: Self-Conditioned Credit Assignment for Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.18810 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.18810/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 22 of its 30 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reinforcement learning for reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reinforcement-learning-for-reasoning/)
- LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation / [Process reward models for reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/alignment/process-reward-models-for-reasoning/)
- Knowledge distillation / [On-policy and self-distillation for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/distill/on-policy-and-self-distillation-for-llms/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.02531/) (2015)
- [Let's Verify Step by Step](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.20050/) (2023)
- [LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.07974/) (2024)
- [Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.20783/) (2025)
- [WebShop: Towards Scalable Real-World Web Interaction with Grounded Language Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.01206/) (2022)
- [DeepSeek-V4: Towards Highly Efficient Million-Token Context Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.19348/) (2026)
- [On-Policy Distillation of Language Models: Learning from Self-Generated Mistakes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.13649/) (2023)
- [Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.08935/) (2023)
- [AppWorld: A Controllable World of Apps and People for Benchmarking Interactive Coding Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.18901/) (2024)
- [Interpretable Preferences via Multi-Objective Reward Modeling and Mixture-of-Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12845/) (2024)
- [Reinforcement Learning via Self-Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.20802/) (2026)
- [Rethinking On-Policy Distillation of Large Language Models: Phenomenology, Mechanism, and Recipe](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.13016/) (2026)
- [REINFORCE++: Stabilizing Critic-Free Policy Optimization with Global Advantage Normalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.03262/) (2025)
- [On Designing Effective RL Reward at Training Time for LLM Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.15115/) (2024)
- [Acting Less is Reasoning More! Teaching Model to Act Efficiently](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.14870/) (2025)
- [HDPO: Hybrid Distillation Policy Optimization via Privileged Self-Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.23871/) (2026)
- [Unlocking Exploration in RLVR: Uncertainty-aware Advantage Shaping for Deeper Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.10649/) (2025)
- [MiniPLM: Knowledge Distillation for Pre-Training Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.17215/) (2024)
- [ABKD: Pursuing a Proper Allocation of the Probability Mass in Knowledge Distillation via α-β-Divergence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.04560/) (2025)
- [TAID: Temporally Adaptive Interpolated Distillation for Efficient Knowledge Transfer in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.16937/) (2025)
- [Incorporating Self-Rewriting into Large Language Model Reasoning Reinforcement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.16331/) (2025)
- [Adversarial Training for Process Reward Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.22888/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Privileged Likelihood Is Not Automatically Value: Three Checks for Token Credit in On-Policy Self-Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.09263/) (2026)
- [OPDSearch+: On-Policy Distillation with RL Refinement for Search-Augmented Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.24310/) (2026)
- [When and Where to Trust the Teacher: Unifying On-Policy Distillation and GRPO through Entropy-Calibrated Credit Assignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.28385/) (2026)
- [ReTeach: Building a Self-Teacher through Multi-Round Reflection and Retry](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.11529/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has driven substantial progress in training LLMs for reasoning tasks, but representative methods such as GRPO assign uniform credit across all tokens, wasting gradient on routine tokens while under-crediting pivotal reasoning steps. Existing token-level credit assignment methods require resources beyond the model's own rollouts. GRPO variants rely on process reward models or ground-truth answers. Knowledge distillation assigns credit through per-token divergence but requires external teachers (On-Policy Distillation) or privileged information (On-Policy Self Distillation). However, these dependencies limit applicability in the pure RLVR setting. We observe that conditioning the model on its own verified trajectories induces a measurable per-token KL divergence between the original and conditioned distributions, and prove that distilling from a self-teacher constructed by verified trajectories leads to infeasible weighted-average solutions when multiple verified trajectories exist. We propose SC-GRPO (Self-Conditioned GRPO), which uses KL divergence mentioned before as a multiplicative weight on GRPO gradients. Across five benchmarks spanning math, code, and agentic tasks, SC-GRPO consistently outperforms 8.1% over GRPO and 5.9% over DAPO with stronger OOD performance. Moreover, SC-GRPO achieves higher performance than OPD.