# Stealthy World Model Manipulation via Data Poisoning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.18697 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.18697/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in World model security and GUI agents, one of 11 directions in World models.
- Builds on 29 of its 36 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2026.

## Placed in

- World models / [World model security and GUI agents](https://mlsanity.com/wm/world-model-security-and-gui-agents/)
- LLM safety and security / [Backdoor and data poisoning attacks](https://mlsanity.com/safety/backdoor-and-data-poisoning-attacks/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 29 of 29)

- [Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actor](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.01290/) (2018)
- [Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1509.02971/) (2015)
- [World Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.10122/) (2018)
- [Learning Latent Dynamics for Planning from Pixels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.04551/) (2018)
- [Mastering Diverse Domains through World Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.04104/) (2023)
- [Meta-World: A Benchmark and Evaluation for Multi-Task and Meta Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10897/) (2019)
- [Planning with Diffusion for Flexible Behavior Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.09991/) (2022)
- [DeepMind Control Suite](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.00690/) (2018)
- [Cosmos World Foundation Model Platform for Physical AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.03575/) (2025)
- [Deep Reinforcement Learning in a Handful of Trials using Probabilistic Dynamics Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.12114/) (2018)
- [When to Trust Your Model: Model-Based Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.08253/) (2019)
- [TD-MPC2: Scalable, Robust World Models for Continuous Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.16828/) (2023)
- [Model-Based Reinforcement Learning for Atari](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.00374/) (2019)
- [Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.11815/) (2019)
- [DINO-WM: World Models on Pre-trained Visual Features enable Zero-shot Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.04983/) (2024)
- [ManiSkill2: A Unified Benchmark for Generalizable Manipulation Skills](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04659/) (2023)
- [Imitating Human Behaviour with Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.10677/) (2023)
- [Approximation Methods for Bilevel Programming](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.02246/) (2018)
- [Hyperparameter optimization with approximate gradient](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.02355/) (2016)
- [Towards Poisoning of Deep Learning Algorithms with Back-gradient Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.08689/) (2017)
- [Witches' Brew: Industrial Scale Data Poisoning via Gradient Matching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.02276/) (2020)
- [Investigating Bi-Level Optimization for Learning and Vision from a Unified Perspective: A Survey and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.11517/) (2021)
- [Self-Tuning Networks: Bilevel Optimization of Hyperparameters using Structured Best-Response Functions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.03088/) (2019)
- [BOME! Bilevel Optimization Made Easy: A Simple First-Order Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.08709/) (2022)
- [Adaptive Reward-Poisoning Attacks against Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.12613/) (2020)
- [Policy Teaching via Environment Poisoning: Training-time Adversarial Attacks against Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.12909/) (2020)
- [MyoSuite -- A contact-rich simulation suite for musculoskeletal motor control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.13600/) (2022)
- [Efficient Adversarial Training without Attacking: Worst-Case-Aware Robust Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.05927/) (2022)
- [De-Pois: An Attack-Agnostic Defense against Data Poisoning Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.03592/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [TrojanWorld: Backdooring World-Model Agents via Imagination Steering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.07051/) (2026)
- [When the World Lies: Backdoor Attacks on Latent World Models for Downstream Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.15781/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Model-based learning agents use learned world models to predict future states, plan actions, and adapt to new environments. However, the process of updating world models from collected experience creates a training-time attack surface: adversarially poisoned fine-tuning trajectories can manipulate the learned dynamics and thereby corrupt downstream planning. In this paper, we propose SWAAP, the first two-stage data poisoning framework for learned world models. In the first stage, SWAAP identifies a harmful target world model that induces low-return behavior under planning while remaining close to clean dynamics, using first-order bilevel optimization enabled by a transition-gradient theorem. In the second stage, SWAAP realizes this target through stealth-constrained gradient matching, modifying only a limited fraction of fine-tuning transition targets so that the induced training gradients steer the victim model toward the adversarial target, while a prediction-error regularizer encourages the poisoned targets to remain close to the world model's natural approximation error. To assess attack stealthiness, we evaluate defenses and detectability across three stages of the poisoning pipeline: pre-training detection of poisoned transitions, robust training during fine-tuning, and test-time monitoring of the resulting world model. Across diverse continuous-control tasks, SWAAP causes substantial performance degradation while keeping poisoned transitions close to clean data and evading the evaluated non-adaptive residual/CUSUM/TRIM-style defenses. These results reveal a practical vulnerability in world-model adaptation pipelines and highlight the need for robustness methods that protect both world-model training data and learned dynamics.
