# Geometric Consistency Protocol for Foundation Model Features in Multi-View Satellite Imagery

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.17564 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.17564/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 15 of its 22 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [Segment Anything](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.02643/) (2023)
- [DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.07193/) (2023)
- [3D Gaussian Splatting for Real-Time Radiance Field Rendering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.04079/) (2023)
- [Plenoxels: Radiance Fields without Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.05131/) (2021)
- [DINOv3](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.10104/) (2025)
- [Improving 2D Feature Representations by 3D-Aware Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.20229/) (2024)
- [CHOICE: Benchmarking the Remote Sensing Capabilities of Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.18145/) (2024)
- [Lift3D: Zero-Shot Lifting of Any 2D Vision Model to 3D](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.18922/) (2024)
- [An Evaluation of DUSt3R/MASt3R/VGGT 3D Reconstruction on Photogrammetric Aerial Blocks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.14798/) (2025)
- [GeoCrossBench: Cross-Band Generalization for Remote Sensing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.02831/) (2025)
- [Comparative Analysis of Advanced Feature Matching Algorithms in Challenging High Spatial Resolution Optical Satellite Stereo Scenarios](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.06246/) (2024)
- [Towards Efficient Benchmarking of Foundation Models in Remote Sensing: A Capabilities Encoding Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.03299/) (2025)
- [Deep Learning Based Domain Adaptation Methods in Remote Sensing: A Comprehensive Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.15615/) (2025)
- [Multi-View Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.15708/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [EO-VGGT: Orbital Ray-Conditioned 3D Foundation Models for Satellite Multi-View Reconstruction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.00417/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Standardized evaluation protocols are indispensable for robust benchmarking in remote sensing, particularly as foundation features are increasingly transferred across diverse sensors and complex imaging geometries. In satellite multi-view reconstruction, conventional evaluations relying on unconstrained 2D global matching are often misleading. The Rational Function Model (RFM) and its Rational Polynomial Coefficients (RPC) dictate a curved, height-dependent epipolar geometry that render flat 2D search spaces physically inconsistent. We propose a geometry-faithful and reproducible protocol tailored for the RPC framework. Our approach integrates an RPC-projected 3D consistency metric with a geometry-constrained dense matching proxy, specifically evaluating whether similarity responses remain localized and unique under physically plausible search manifolds. A pivotal finding of our joint reporting strategy is the decoupling of semantic agreement and geometric localization: high cross-view similarity at a projected 3D point does not guarantee reliable matchability in practical inference. Our benchmark demonstrates that incorporating geometric constraints is fundamental to the problem definition in satellite imagery. Furthermore, we show that state-of-the-art 2D backbones remain remarkably competitive against specialized 3D-aware models when subjected to this RPC-consistent evaluation.