# Cross-Silo De-Anonymization Under Local Differential Privacy: Threat Model, Phase Transition, and Coordination Necessity

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.16763 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.16763/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 9 of its 25 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 15 Jun 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.05629/) (2016)
- [Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.04977/) (2019)
- [Deep Learning with Differential Privacy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.00133/) (2016)
- [Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.05820/) (2016)
- [Membership Inference Attacks From First Principles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.03570/) (2021)
- [Concentrated Differential Privacy: Simplifications, Extensions, and Lower Bounds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1605.02065/) (2016)
- [Amplification by Shuffling: From Local to Central Differential Privacy via Anonymity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.12469/) (2018)
- [Distributed Differential Privacy via Shuffling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.01394/) (2018)
- [Blowfish Privacy: Tuning Privacy-Utility Trade-offs using Policies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.3913/) (2013)

## Abstract (arXiv)

When a person's records appear in k independent data silos, each protected by (epsilon, delta)-differential privacy, standard composition yields a valid (k*epsilon, k*delta)-DP guarantee for the joint output. This worst-case bound, however, does not answer the concrete inference question: at what k can an adversary actually identify a target person? This paper develops the information-theoretic framework needed to answer that question. We introduce cross-silo person-level DP (XSP-DP), a Pufferfish-style privacy notion whose adjacency relation captures all records of a single person across all silos simultaneously, and verify that the standard basic composition bound carries over to this adjacency model. Within this framework we prove that de-anonymization undergoes a phase transition at k* = Theta(log n / epsilon^2) (population size n, per-silo RR parameter epsilon): a Fano lower bound shows any estimator fails for k << k*, while a matching maximum-likelihood upper bound shows the attack succeeds for k >> k*. An explicit XOR + randomized-response construction demonstrates information synergy: each silo's output is individually uninformative about the target, yet the joint mutual information is strictly positive. For non-coordinated binary randomized-response mechanisms, we prove that de-anonymization is inevitable once k exceeds the threshold, establishing that cross-silo coordination is necessary. These results provide a baseline threat model and Theta-level threshold for cross-silo inference attacks under local DP.