# Let Them Steal: Trapping Large Language Model Extraction Attacks with Knowledge Honeypot

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.15810 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.15810/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 42 of its 61 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 42)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.13138/) (2022)
- [What Disease does this Patient Have? A Large-scale Open Domain Question Answering Dataset from Medical Exams](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.13081/) (2020)
- [Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.02697/) (2016)
- [Membership Inference Attacks From First Principles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.03570/) (2021)
- [A Survey on Knowledge Graphs: Representation, Acquisition and Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.00388/) (2020)
- [Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.02943/) (2016)
- [FinQA: A Dataset of Numerical Reasoning over Financial Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.00122/) (2021)
- [QA-GNN: Reasoning with Language Models and Knowledge Graphs for Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.06378/) (2021)
- [K-BERT: Enabling Language Representation with Knowledge Graph](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.07606/) (2019)
- [Knockoff Nets: Stealing Functionality of Black-Box Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.02766/) (2018)
- [Think-on-Graph: Deep and Responsible Reasoning of Large Language Model on Knowledge Graph](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.07697/) (2023)
- [High Accuracy and High Fidelity Extraction of Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.01838/) (2019)
- [When Does Pretraining Help? Assessing Self-Supervised Learning for Law and the CaseHOLD Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08671/) (2021)
- [ConvFinQA: Exploring the Chain of Numerical Reasoning in Conversational Finance Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03849/) (2022)
- [GreaseLM: Graph REASoning Enhanced Language Models for Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.08860/) (2022)
- [PRADA: Protecting against DNN Model Stealing Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.02628/) (2018)
- [Stealing Part of a Production Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.06634/) (2024)
- [Entangled Watermarks as a Defense against Model Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.12200/) (2020)
- [Thieves on Sesame Street! Model Extraction of BERT-based APIs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.12366/) (2019)
- [DAWN: Dynamic Adversarial Watermarking of Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.00830/) (2019)
- [CoLAKE: Contextualized Language and Knowledge Embedding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.00309/) (2020)
- [Exploring Connections Between Active Learning and Model Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.02054/) (2018)
- [Prediction Poisoning: Towards Defenses Against DNN Model Stealing Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.10908/) (2019)
- [CATER: Intellectual Property Protection on Text Generation APIs via Conditional Watermarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.08773/) (2022)
- [Copycat CNN: Stealing Knowledge by Persuading Confession with Random Non-Labeled Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.05476/) (2018)
- [Are You Copying My Model? Protecting the Copyright of Large Language Models for EaaS via Backdoor Watermark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10036/) (2023)
- [Defending Against Model Stealing Attacks with Adaptive Misinformation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.07100/) (2019)
- [Gotta Catch 'Em All: Using Honeypots to Catch Adversarial Attacks on Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.08554/) (2019)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [HoneyRoute: Honeypot-Model Routing for Adversarial LLM Serving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.08306/) (2026)
- [Capability Scaling-Down Laws for LLM Compression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.02462/) (2026)
- [The Limits of Query Monitoring against Distributed Model Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.13083/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models deployed as commercial APIs are vulnerable to model extraction attacks, while existing defenses either act too late or degrade utility for legitimate users. We propose Knowledge Trap, a defense that redirects extraction attacks toward low-transferability knowledge through a Honeypot Knowledge Graph (HKG) and breadcrumb-guided exploration. Instead of blocking queries or perturbing outputs, Knowledge Trap consumes the attacker's limited query budget on knowledge with negligible downstream utility while preserving benign-user performance. Experiments in medical and financial domains show that Knowledge Trap reduces surrogate Agreement by 6.2% on average without degrading legitimate-user accuracy, outperforming existing defenses that impose measurable user impact. These results suggest that defending knowledge-space traversal is a practical direction for mitigating LLM extraction attacks.
