# Minimal Oversight: Uncertainty-Aware Governance for Delegated AI Systems

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.15563 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.15563/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 10 of its 31 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.08073/) (2022)
- [AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.08155/) (2023)
- [Concrete Problems in AI Safety](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.06565/) (2016)
- [Scaling Laws For Scalable Oversight](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.18530/) (2025)
- [Intelligent AI Delegation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.11865/) (2026)
- [AdaptOrch: Task-Adaptive Multi-Agent Orchestration in the Era of LLM Performance Convergence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.16873/) (2026)
- [Agent Contracts: A Formal Framework for Resource-Bounded Autonomous AI Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.08815/) (2026)
- [Agentproof: Static Verification of Agent Workflow Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.20356/) (2026)
- [Herding CATs: ALARA for Agent Harness Engineering in Portable Composable Multi-Agent Teams](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.20380/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

AI systems increasingly delegate decisions to specialized models, evaluators, tools, and supervisory controllers. The central AI problem is no longer only model accuracy, but uncertainty-aware governance: how much autonomy to grant, which evidence should calibrate trust, what performance ceiling a delegated AI system can sustain, and when human intervention becomes necessary. We propose the Minimum Sufficient Oversight Principle (MSO), a variational principle for principled autonomy delegation: minimize governance burden on the Fisher information manifold subject to a delivery constraint. The resulting Euler-Lagrange solution yields a water-filling allocation of governed delegation across the task space. Building on a revealed-action governed delegation channel model, we prove a capacity theorem for stationary symbolwise review policies, derive a local first-order approximation relating workflow complexity to quality degradation, and give a drift-dominated autonomy-time scaling law linking intervention timing to effective capacity, complexity, and drift. Within this framework, masking appears as a structural AI-governance pathology: corrected performance can hide the competence signal needed to calibrate trust. Synthetic simulations and a semi-real reconstructed workflow support design prescriptions including upstream-first correction, sensitivity-based intervention, and explicit feasibility checks before autonomy is expanded. The result is a computable framework for uncertainty, planning, and oversight in delegated AI systems. A companion Python package is available at https://github.com/crbazevedo/delegation-lab.
