# AQ4SViT: An Automated Quantization Framework with Search Gating Policy for Compressing Spiking Vision Transformers

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.15523 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.15523/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 22 of its 29 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [Transformers in Vision: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.01169/) (2021)
- [A Survey on Visual Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.12556/) (2020)
- [Quantizing deep convolutional networks for efficient inference: A whitepaper](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.08342/) (2018)
- [Spikformer: When Spiking Neural Network Meets Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.15425/) (2022)
- [SpikingJelly: An open-source machine learning infrastructure platform for spike-based intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.16620/) (2023)
- [Spike-driven Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.01694/) (2023)
- [Spike-driven Transformer V2: Meta Spiking Neural Network Architecture Inspiring the Design of Next-generation Neuromorphic Chips](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.03663/) (2024)
- [Scaling Spike-driven Transformer with Efficient Spike Firing Approximation Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.16061/) (2024)
- [STDP Based Pruning of Connections and Weight Quantization in Spiking Neural Networks for Energy Efficient Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.04734/) (2017)
- [Optimizing the energy consumption of spiking neural networks for neuromorphic applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01268/) (2019)
- [Q-SpiNN: A Framework for Quantizing Spiking Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.01807/) (2021)
- [FSpiNN: An Optimization Framework for Memory- and Energy-Efficient Spiking Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.08860/) (2020)
- [Quantized Spike-driven Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.13492/) (2025)
- [SpikeNAS: A Fast Memory-Aware Neural Architecture Search Framework for Spiking Neural Network-based Embedded AI Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.11322/) (2024)
- [Spikingformer: A Key Foundation Model for Spiking Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.11954/) (2023)
- [Continual Learning with Neuromorphic Computing: Foundations, Methods, and Emerging Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.09218/) (2024)
- [QSViT: A Methodology for Quantizing Spiking Vision Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.00948/) (2025)
- [Enabling Efficient Processing of Spiking Neural Networks with On-Chip Learning on Commodity Neuromorphic Processors for Edge AI Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.00957/) (2025)
- [QSLM: A Performance- and Memory-aware Quantization Framework with Tiered Search Strategy for Spike-driven Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.00679/) (2026)
- [Trimming Down Large Spiking Vision Transformers via Heterogeneous Quantization Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.05505/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Spiking Vision Transformers (SViTs) have emerged as alternative low-power ViT models, but their large sizes hinder their deployments on resource-constrained embedded AI systems. To address this, state-of-the-art works proposed quantization techniques to compress SViT models, but their manual, human-guided approach needs a huge design time and power/energy consumption to find the appropriate quantization setting for each given network, making this approach not scalable for quantizing multiple networks. Toward this, we propose AQ4SViT, a novel automated quantization framework for SViTs that can provide quick quantization settings with good trade-offs between accuracy and memory. To achieve this, AQ4SViT employs the following key ideas: quantization search strategy that evaluates the quantization setting candidates while considering the accuracy constraint; and search gating policy that quickly evaluates and selects promising quantization candidates by leveraging membrane potential drift as a performance proxy. In the search gating policy, AQSViT employs two search algorithm variants to provide trade-off options: Greedy search, which performs fast but may lead to local optima; and Beam search, which performs slower but has better performance in finding global optima selection due to a wider search space. Experimental results show that AQ4SViT-Greedy quickly finds the appropriate quantization settings, achieving up to 6.6x faster search time and up to 82.5% memory saving compared to the state-of-the-art; while AQ4SViT-Beam further reduces the memory footprint by up to 90% compared to the state-of-the-art, but with 4.5x longer search time; all these results are obtained while maintaining high accuracy within 1.5% from the original/non-quantized models on the ImageNet dataset. These results highlight that AQ4SViT framework offers advancements toward SViT deployments on embedded AI systems.