# QPILOTS: Efficient Test-Time Q-Steering for Flow Policies

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.14801 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.14801/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Diffusion and flow policies for robotics, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models.
- Builds on 61 of its 62 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2026.

## Placed in

- Diffusion models / [Diffusion and flow policies for robotics](https://mlsanity.com/diffusion/diffusion-and-flow-policies-for-robotics/)
- Deep reinforcement learning methods / [RL with diffusion and flow models](https://mlsanity.com/deeprl/rl-with-diffusion-and-flow-models/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 61)

- [Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.13456/) (2020)
- [Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.05233/) (2021)
- [Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.12598/) (2022)
- [Flow Matching for Generative Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.02747/) (2022)
- [Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actor](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.01290/) (2018)
- [Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flow](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.03003/) (2022)
- [Diffusion Policy: Visuomotor Policy Learning via Action Diffusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.04137/) (2023)
- [π0: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.24164/) (2024)
- [π0.5: a Vision-Language-Action Model with Open-World Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.16054/) (2025)
- [LIBERO: Benchmarking Knowledge Transfer for Lifelong Robot Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.03310/) (2023)
- [Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.06169/) (2021)
- [Planning with Diffusion for Flexible Behavior Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.09991/) (2022)
- [A Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.06860/) (2021)
- [Advantage-Weighted Regression: Simple and Scalable Off-Policy Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.00177/) (2019)
- [Maximum Likelihood Training of Score-Based Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.09258/) (2021)
- [Diffusion Policies as an Expressive Policy Class for Offline Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.06193/) (2022)
- [Is Conditional Generative Modeling all you need for Decision-Making?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.15657/) (2022)
- [Universal Guidance for Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.07121/) (2023)
- [Efficient Online Reinforcement Learning with Offline Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.02948/) (2023)
- [Maximum a Posteriori Policy Optimisation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.06920/) (2018)
- [IDQL: Implicit Q-Learning as an Actor-Critic Method with Diffusion Policies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.10573/) (2023)
- [Diffusion Policy Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.00588/) (2024)
- [Residual Reinforcement Learning for Robot Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.03201/) (2018)
- [OGBench: Benchmarking Offline Goal-Conditioned RL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.20092/) (2024)
- [Cal-QL: Calibrated Offline RL Pre-Training for Efficient Online Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.05479/) (2023)
- [Practical and Asymptotically Exact Conditional Sampling in Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.17775/) (2023)
- [Offline-to-Online Reinforcement Learning via Balanced Replay and Pessimistic Q-Ensemble](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.00591/) (2021)
- [Flow Q-Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.02538/) (2025)
- [Steering Your Diffusion Policy with Latent Space Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.15799/) (2025)
- [Hybrid RL: Using Both Offline and Online Data Can Make RL Efficient](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.06718/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Adjoint Guidance Flow: Amortized Critic Guidance for VLA Policies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.34944/) (2026)
- [Diffusion Policy Improvement with Proposal-Conditioned Refinement Flows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.36812/) (2026)
- [Reinforcement Learning via Fixed-point Flow Matching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.12848/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Flow-matching and diffusion policies are expressive action generators, but optimizing them with temporal-difference reinforcement learning (RL) remains difficult. Effective policy extraction requires exploiting the critic's action gradient, yet directly backpropagating this signal through a multi-step denoising process can be numerically unstable. Existing methods work around this either by discarding gradient information, distilling the policy into a simpler one-step actor, or repeatedly fine-tuning the denoising policy as the critic improves. We propose QPILOTS, a method that leaves the original policy unmodified and steers the denoising process at inference time. At each denoising step, instead of evaluating the critic on the noisy intermediate action where critic predictions are unreliable, we first project that intermediate state to an estimate of the final clean action and compute the critic gradient there. We introduce two variants: QPILOTS-U uses a fast single-point approximation, while QPILOTS-M draws differentiable posterior samples via a learned auxiliary network. On a standard offline-to-online RL benchmark, QPILOTS achieves the best aggregate performance, reaching an average success rate of 90% across 50 tasks. We also apply QPILOTS to steer a large, frozen, pretrained Vision-Language Action (VLA) foundation model, outperforming or matching prior inference-time approaches across six manipulation tasks in simulation.