# The Perceived Fragility of Explanations in Audio Models: Manipulation of Attribution with Unchanged Predictions

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.14466 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.14466/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 12 of its 19 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02391/) (2016)
- [Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.06083/) (2017)
- [CNN Architectures for Large-Scale Audio Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.09430/) (2016)
- [Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragile](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.10547/) (2017)
- [Explanations can be manipulated and geometry is to blame](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.07983/) (2019)
- [Fooling Neural Network Interpretations via Adversarial Model Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.02041/) (2019)
- [CDPAM: Contrastive learning for perceptual audio similarity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.05109/) (2021)
- [SONICS: Synthetic Or Not -- Identifying Counterfeit Songs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.14080/) (2024)
- [Zimtohrli: An Efficient Psychoacoustic Audio Similarity Metric](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.26133/) (2025)
- [Beyond Lp clipping: Equalization-based Psychoacoustic Attacks against ASRs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.13250/) (2021)
- [A Data-Driven Diffusion-based Approach for Audio Deepfake Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.03425/) (2025)
- [Right Predictions, Misleading Explanations: On the Vulnerability of Vision-Language Model Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.16651/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This paper investigates the fragility of post-hoc explanation methods in audio deepfake detection. While previous work on explanation manipulation focused on images using standard Lp metrics, we introduce a psychoacoustic framework that optimizes inaudible perturbations to decouple model attributions from final classifications. We evaluate this vulnerability across state-of-the-art architectures under strict prediction-preserving constraints. By evaluating the manipulation cost through domain-specific perceptual audio quality metrics alongside explanation alignment criteria, our framework demonstrates that an adversary can systematically distort automated explanation heatmaps while preserving the predicted deepfake label. Full code available at: https://github.com/cncPomper/Audio-XAI
