# Same-Origin Policy for Agentic Browsers

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.14027 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.14027/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 12 of its 32 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Agent threats, guardrails and governance](https://mlsanity.com/agents/agent-threats-guardrails-and-governance/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.13854/) (2023)
- [GPT-4V(ision) is a Generalist Web Agent, if Grounded](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.01614/) (2024)
- [WASP: Benchmarking Web Agent Security Against Prompt Injection Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.18575/) (2025)
- [EIA: Environmental Injection Attack on Generalist Web Agents for Privacy Leakage](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.11295/) (2024)
- [Attacking Vision-Language Computer Agents via Pop-ups](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.02391/) (2024)
- [PromptArmor: Simple yet Effective Prompt Injection Defenses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.15219/) (2025)
- [VisualWebArena: Evaluating Multimodal Agents on Realistic Visual Web Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.13649/) (2024)
- [AgentVigil: Generic Black-Box Red-teaming for Indirect Prompt Injection against LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.05849/) (2025)
- [WAInjectBench: Benchmarking Prompt Injection Detections for Web Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.01354/) (2025)
- [BrowseSafe: Understanding and Preventing Prompt Injection Within AI Browser Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.20597/) (2025)
- [WebSentinel: Detecting and Localizing Prompt Injection Attacks for Web Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.03792/) (2026)
- [WARD: Adversarially Robust Defense of Web Agents Against Prompt Injections](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.15030/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [AgentTell: Behavioural Side-Channel Leakage in Browser-Use Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.32915/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Agentic browsers integrate autonomous AI agents into web browsers, enabling users to accomplish web tasks through natural-language instructions. The same-origin policy (SOP) is a fundamental browser security mechanism that prevents unauthorized automated cross-origin data flows induced by scripts. However, whether SOP remains effective in agentic browsers is an open question that has not been systematically studied. In this work, we bridge this gap. We first observe that an agentic browser can itself serve as an automated channel for cross-origin data flows, potentially leading to SOP violations. To investigate this phenomenon, we construct SOPBench, a benchmark for evaluating SOP violations in agentic browsers. Our evaluation shows that existing agentic browsers frequently violate SOP, both in benign settings and under attacks. To address this problem, we propose SOPGuard, an SOP enforcement mechanism tailored to agentic browsers. We implement SOPGuard in BrowserOS, an open-source agentic browser. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that SOPGuard effectively enforces SOP while preserving utility and incurring only a small runtime overhead. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/wxl-lxw/BrowserOS-SOPGuard.