# Output-Level Regularization Eliminates the Seed Lottery in Single-GPU VLA Fine-Tuning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.13856 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.13856/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Efficient VLA inference and adaptation, one of 13 directions in Vision-language-action models.
- Builds on 20 of its 25 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2026.

## Placed in

- Vision-language-action models / [Efficient VLA inference and adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/vla/efficient-vla-inference-and-adaptation/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.00796/) (2016)
- [Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.07733/) (2020)
- [RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.15818/) (2023)
- [OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.09246/) (2024)
- [The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.03635/) (2018)
- [Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reduction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03230/) (2021)
- [LIBERO: Benchmarking Knowledge Transfer for Lifelong Robot Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.03310/) (2023)
- [VICReg: Variance-Invariance-Covariance Regularization for Self-Supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.04906/) (2021)
- [Fine-Tuning Vision-Language-Action Models: Optimizing Speed and Success](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.19645/) (2025)
- [V-JEPA 2: Self-Supervised Video Models Enable Understanding, Prediction and Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.09985/) (2025)
- [Deep Reinforcement Learning that Matters](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.06560/) (2017)
- [SpatialVLA: Exploring Spatial Representations for Visual-Language-Action Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.15830/) (2025)
- [Fine-Tuning Pretrained Language Models: Weight Initializations, Data Orders, and Early Stopping](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.06305/) (2020)
- [LeWorldModel: Stable End-to-End Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture from Pixels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.19312/) (2026)
- [On the Stability of Fine-tuning BERT: Misconceptions, Explanations, and Strong Baselines](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.04884/) (2020)
- [Mixout: Effective Regularization to Finetune Large-scale Pretrained Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.11299/) (2019)
- [DynaMo: In-Domain Dynamics Pretraining for Visuo-Motor Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12192/) (2024)
- [Seq-VCR: Preventing Collapse in Intermediate Transformer Representations for Enhanced Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.02344/) (2024)
- [Var-JEPA: A Variational Formulation of the Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture - Bridging Predictive and Generative Self-Supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.20111/) (2026)
- [Fine-tuning MLLMs Without Forgetting Is Easier Than You Think](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.14493/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Fine-tuning a vision-language-action model (VLA-JEPA) on a single GPU should be simple: load a pretrained checkpoint, run training, deploy. There is a hidden danger. Run the same fine-tuning code thirteen times -- same data, same architecture, different random seed -- and twelve runs produce a robot succeeding 91--94% of the time, while one run silently degrades to 65.2%: a 29 pp gap with no error message, no warning, and no way to predict which seed will fail. We call this the seed lottery. We trace the cause to output collapse: the action predictor quietly learns to produce nearly identical outputs regardless of what the robot sees. Existing weight-level methods (L2, EWC) are structurally blind to this collapse -- they penalize weight changes, but collapse occurs in directions weights can move freely without affecting outputs, a gap we formalize via the Jacobian null-space. Across 7 methods x up to 13 seeds x 3 LIBERO benchmarks, three output-level regularizers -- VICReg (n=12 seeds), Dropout (n=4), and a halved learning rate (n=5) -- each eliminate every catastrophic seed (0/21 combined collapses vs. 1/13 Baseline; F(12,11)=28.7, p<0.001), while weight-level methods (L2, EWC) preserve the lottery. The simplest fix is changing one number in your optimizer config.