# SpatialClaw: Rethinking Action Interface for Agentic Spatial Reasoning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.13673 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.13673/

## Key facts

- Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 44 of its 59 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Spatial and embodied reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/spatial-and-embodied-reasoning/)
- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [Embodied and 3D vision-language models](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/embodied-and-3d-vision-language-models/)
- LLM agents and tool use / [Multimodal and embodied agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/multimodal-and-embodied-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 44)

- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [End-to-End Object Detection with Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.12872/) (2020)
- [Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.06180/) (2023)
- [SAM 2: Segment Anything in Images and Videos](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.00714/) (2024)
- [Video-MME: The First-Ever Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark of Multi-modal LLMs in Video Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.21075/) (2024)
- [HuggingGPT: Solving AI Tasks with ChatGPT and its Friends in Hugging Face](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17580/) (2023)
- [SAM 3: Segment Anything with Concepts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.16719/) (2025)
- [SpatialVLM: Endowing Vision-Language Models with Spatial Reasoning Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.12168/) (2024)
- [Depth Anything 3: Recovering the Visual Space from Any Views](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.10647/) (2025)
- [Thinking in Space: How Multimodal Large Language Models See, Remember, and Recall Spaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.14171/) (2024)
- [ViperGPT: Visual Inference via Python Execution for Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08128/) (2023)
- [Executable Code Actions Elicit Better LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01030/) (2024)
- [BLINK: Multimodal Large Language Models Can See but Not Perceive](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.12390/) (2024)
- [Visual Programming: Compositional visual reasoning without training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.11559/) (2022)
- [π3: Permutation-Equivariant Visual Geometry Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.13347/) (2025)
- [SpatialRGPT: Grounded Spatial Reasoning in Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.01584/) (2024)
- [MMSI-Bench: A Benchmark for Multi-Image Spatial Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.23764/) (2025)
- [VLM-3R: Vision-Language Models Augmented with Instruction-Aligned 3D Reconstruction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.20279/) (2025)
- [From Flatland to Space: Teaching Vision-Language Models to Perceive and Reason in 3D](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.22976/) (2025)
- [RoboSpatial: Teaching Spatial Understanding to 2D and 3D Vision-Language Models for Robotics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.16537/) (2024)
- [ViewSpatial-Bench: Evaluating Multi-perspective Spatial Localization in Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.21500/) (2025)
- [OmniSpatial: Towards Comprehensive Spatial Reasoning Benchmark for Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.03135/) (2025)
- [PyVision: Agentic Vision with Dynamic Tooling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.07998/) (2025)
- [OctoTools: An Agentic Framework with Extensible Tools for Complex Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.11271/) (2025)
- [Eagle 2.5: Boosting Long-Context Post-Training for Frontier Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.15271/) (2025)
- [G2VLM: Geometry Grounded Vision Language Model with Unified 3D Reconstruction and Spatial Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.21688/) (2025)
- [Visual Agentic AI for Spatial Reasoning with a Dynamic API](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.06787/) (2025)
- [MMSI-Video-Bench: A Holistic Benchmark for Video-Based Spatial Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.10863/) (2025)
- [SpatialBench: Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models for Spatial Cognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.21471/) (2025)
- [PAI-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark For Physical AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.01989/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [Evolution Fine-Tuning: Learning to Discover Across 371 Optimization Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.29082/) (2026)
- [Self-Evolving Neuro-Symbolic Skills for Tool-Augmented Spatial Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.07955/) (2026)
- [Zone of Proximal Policy Optimization: Teacher in Prompts, Not Gradients](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.18216/) (2026)
- [Spatial Memory Agent: Experience-Grounded Procedure Memory for Spatial Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.12743/) (2026)
- [Mid-Harness: Scaling Actions Between Model and Harness for Terminal Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.39982/) (2026)
- [R3D: Quantitative 3D Spatial Reasoning for Egocentric Wearables](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.02921/) (2026)
- [PhysAI-Bench: A Benchmark for LLM-Based Agentic Decision-Making in Autonomous UAV-Centric Physical AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.23695/) (2026)
- [KeyRec: Bounded Visual Memory for Streaming and Long-Video Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.32182/) (2026)
- [Agentic Relative Camera Pose Estimation via Learned Ranking and Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.38755/) (2026)
- [EvoDuet: Bilevel Co-Evolution of Web Searching and Task Solving for Scientific Discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.40340/) (2026)
- [Are Frontier VLM Agents Ready to Be Robot Generalists? An Empirical Study with the Embodied Agent Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.00854/) (2026)
- [From Reasoning Failures to Composable Video Spatial Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.01999/) (2026)
- [SpatialOPSD: Self-Distilling Spatial Intelligence from Verified Coding Agent Traces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.11366/) (2026)
- [Seek-and-View Reasoning for Multi-View Spatial Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.11810/) (2026)
- [Distilling Routed 3D Privilege for Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.12355/) (2026)
- [S-Space: Exploring Spatial Workspace in Multimodal Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.13527/) (2026)
- [SpatialASM: Internalizing Active Mentalization for Spatial Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.13832/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Spatial reasoning, the ability to determine where objects are, how they relate, and how they move in 3D, remains a fundamental challenge for vision-language models (VLMs). Tool-augmented agents attempt to address this by augmenting VLMs with specialist perception modules, yet their effectiveness is bounded by the action interface through which those tools are invoked. In this work, we study how the design of this interface shapes the agent's capacity for open-ended spatial reasoning. Existing spatial agents either employ single-pass code execution, which commits to a full analysis strategy before any intermediate result is observed, or rely on a structured tool-call interface that often offers less flexibility for freely composing operations or tailoring the analysis to each task. Both designs offer limited flexibility for open-ended, complex 3D/4D spatial reasoning. We therefore propose SpatialClaw, a training-free framework for spatial reasoning that adopts code as the action interface. SpatialClaw maintains a stateful Python kernel pre-loaded with input frames and a suite of perception and geometry primitives, letting a VLM-backed agent write one executable cell per step conditioned on all prior outputs, enabling the agent to flexibly compose and manipulate perception results and adapt its analysis to both intermediate text and visual observations and the demands of each problem. Evaluated across 20 spatial reasoning benchmarks spanning a broad range of static and dynamic 3D/4D spatial reasoning tasks, SpatialClaw achieves 59.9% average accuracy, outperforming the recent spatial agent by +11.2 points, with consistent gains across six VLM backbones from two model families without any benchmark- or model-specific adaptation.