# Order Is Not Control: Driven-Dissipative Response Laws Across Artificial and Biological Systems

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.12923 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.12923/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 32 of its 74 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 32)

- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09685/) (2021)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04761/) (2023)
- [Let's Verify Step by Step](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.20050/) (2023)
- [Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.08073/) (2022)
- [Gemma 3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.19786/) (2025)
- [Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01405/) (2023)
- [Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Direction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11717/) (2024)
- [Steering Language Models With Activation Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.10248/) (2023)
- [Phi-4-Mini Technical Report: Compact yet Powerful Multimodal Language Models via Mixture-of-LoRAs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.01743/) (2025)
- [Agent Security Bench (ASB): Formalizing and Benchmarking Attacks and Defenses in LLM-based Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.02644/) (2024)
- [Alignment faking in large language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.14093/) (2024)
- [Towards Best Practices of Activation Patching in Language Models: Metrics and Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.16042/) (2023)
- [Programming Refusal with Conditional Activation Steering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.05907/) (2024)
- [Collective Constitutional AI: Aligning a Language Model with Public Input](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.07814/) (2024)
- [SycEval: Evaluating LLM Sycophancy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.08177/) (2025)
- [Measuring Sycophancy of Language Models in Multi-turn Dialogues](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.23840/) (2025)
- [Thought Crime: Backdoors and Emergent Misalignment in Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.13206/) (2025)
- [FalseReject: A Resource for Improving Contextual Safety and Mitigating Over-Refusals in LLMs via Structured Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.08054/) (2025)
- [Harnessing the Universal Geometry of Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.12540/) (2025)
- [Revisiting the Platonic Representation Hypothesis: An Aristotelian View](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.14486/) (2026)
- [Steering off Course: Reliability Challenges in Steering Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.04635/) (2025)
- [Learning stochastic dynamics from snapshots through regularized unbalanced optimal transport](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.00844/) (2024)
- [Why Do Some Language Models Fake Alignment While Others Don't?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.18032/) (2025)
- [Self-Supervised Alignment with Mutual Information: Learning to Follow Principles without Preference Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.14313/) (2024)
- [DeceptionBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for AI Deception Behaviors in Real-world Scenarios](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.15501/) (2025)
- [Measuring AI R&D Automation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.03992/) (2026)
- [ABC Align: Large Language Model Alignment for Safety & Accuracy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.00307/) (2024)
- [ENIGMA: The Geometry of Reasoning and Alignment in Large-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.11278/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

AI alignment, interpretability, steering, and neural perturbation studies identify order-inducing objects. We argue that order is not control. Control requires a receiver-gated response law: a denominator-indexed operator mapping material state, action/drive, bath, and receiver state to response displacement, sinks, effort, and basin projection. We identify it across biological, LLM, adapter, and stochastic-operator panels. The laws are local: an intervention can be admitted, saturated, sign-changing, leaky, or overdriven depending on medium, bath, receiver state, action port, and comparator. Control is assigned when finite effort moves a target or outcome-readout class under the same denominator while damage, null/evasive, invalid format, overdrive, and unnecessary effort stay bounded. Mouse ALM, C. elegans, and zebrafish panels provide physical response-operator evidence while excluding coordinate identity and controller conclusions. LLM panels show generated-output response laws: across four material conditions, response vectors are predictable at 72.8-73.7% component-sign accuracy, rising to 84.3-84.8% on nonzero components; held-out observers predict system-effect and target/oracle families at 93.6% and 91.7% accuracy. Constitution-conditioned adapters reshape susceptibility as prepared media, and stochastic-operator panels separate measured opportunity from deployable action policies. This gives a driven-dissipative response-system account at the mesoscopic control level: drives act through prepared media, baths, and receivers, producing admitted movement, impedance, sinks, or overdrive. The evidence supports local admitted control and measurable stochastic response operators, while leaving deployable pre-generation control, hidden/logit causal sufficiency, biological-to-LLM coordinate identity, and literal thermodynamic quantities outside scope.