# DailyReport: An Open-ended Benchmark for Evaluating Search Agents on Daily Search Tasks

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.12871 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.12871/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 21 of its 28 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Web, search, and research agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/web-search-and-research-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [BrowseComp: A Simple Yet Challenging Benchmark for Browsing Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.12516/) (2025)
- [GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.15763/) (2026)
- [DeepResearcher: Scaling Deep Research via Reinforcement Learning in Real-world Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.03160/) (2025)
- [DeepResearch Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Deep Research Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.11763/) (2025)
- [Deep Research Agents: A Systematic Examination And Roadmap](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.18096/) (2025)
- [Memento: Fine-tuning LLM Agents without Fine-tuning LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.16153/) (2025)
- [xbench: Tracking Agents Productivity Scaling with Profession-Aligned Real-World Evaluations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.13651/) (2025)
- [ResearchRubrics: A Benchmark of Prompts and Rubrics For Evaluating Deep Research Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.07685/) (2025)
- [WideSearch: Benchmarking Agentic Broad Info-Seeking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.07999/) (2025)
- [Finance Agent Benchmark: Benchmarking LLMs on Real-world Financial Research Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.00828/) (2025)
- [A Survey of LLM-based Deep Search Agents: Paradigm, Optimization, Evaluation, and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.05668/) (2025)
- [DeepShop: A Benchmark for Deep Research Shopping Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.02839/) (2025)
- [MM-BrowseComp: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Multimodal Browsing Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.13186/) (2025)
- [LiveResearchBench: A Live Benchmark for User-Centric Deep Research in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.14240/) (2025)
- [DeepResearch Bench II: Diagnosing Deep Research Agents via Rubrics from Expert Reports](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.08536/) (2026)
- [ResearcherBench: Evaluating Deep AI Research Systems on the Frontiers of Scientific Inquiry](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.16280/) (2025)
- [BEARCUBS: A benchmark for computer-using web agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.07919/) (2025)
- [DRBench: A Realistic Benchmark for Enterprise Deep Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.00172/) (2025)
- [MMDeepResearch-Bench: A Benchmark for Multimodal Deep Research Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.12346/) (2026)
- [DeepResearch-9K: A Challenging Benchmark Dataset of Deep-Research Agent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.01152/) (2026)
- [Understanding DeepResearch via Reports](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.07861/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Search Agents (SAs) typically leverage large language models (LLMs) to support complex information-seeking tasks by autonomously exploring web sources and synthesizing information into comprehensive responses. For SAs evaluation, prior benchmarks mainly focus on specialized tasks that are unlikely to arise in real-world user scenarios. Moreover, their reliance on coarse task-level rubrics often limits evaluation interpretability. To bridge this gap, we introduce DailyReport, an open-ended benchmark to evaluate SA capabilities on daily search tasks. It contains 150 open-ended tasks with 3,546 associated rubrics, capturing widely discussed and timely information demands of real-world users. Each task is decomposed into subtasks and evaluated with cascade rubrics across disentangled dimensions. Through cascade performance attribution and user-centric aggregation, we derive highly interpretable scores for each dimension, along with a user preference score. Our results on 17 agentic systems show that current systems still fall short of users' expectations. To facilitate future research, our dataset and code are made publicly available at https://github.com/AGI-Eval-Official/DailyReport.