# Epistemic Uncertainty Is Not the Reducible Kind

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.12646 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.12646/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 18 of its 22 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.04977/) (2017)
- [Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.09457/) (2019)
- [Deep Bayesian Active Learning with Image Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.02910/) (2017)
- [Predictive Uncertainty Estimation via Prior Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.10501/) (2018)
- [BatchBALD: Efficient and Diverse Batch Acquisition for Deep Bayesian Active Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.08158/) (2019)
- [Deep Evidential Regression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.02600/) (2019)
- [Randomized Prior Functions for Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.03335/) (2018)
- [Understanding Measures of Uncertainty for Adversarial Example Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.08533/) (2018)
- [Quantifying Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: Are Conditional Entropy and Mutual Information Appropriate Measures?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.03302/) (2022)
- [Pitfalls of Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification through Loss Minimisation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.06102/) (2022)
- [Prediction-Oriented Bayesian Active Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.08151/) (2023)
- [Uncertainty in Natural Language Generation: From Theory to Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.15703/) (2023)
- [Minimum Excess Risk in Bayesian Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.14868/) (2020)
- [Sources of Uncertainty in Supervised Machine Learning -- A Statisticians' View](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.16703/) (2023)
- [Galaxy Zoo: Probabilistic Morphology through Bayesian CNNs and Active Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.07424/) (2019)
- [Query-Level Uncertainty in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.09669/) (2025)
- [On out-of-distribution detection with Bayesian neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.06020/) (2021)
- [On the Epistemic Uncertainty of Overparametrized Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.25234/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The standard taxonomy of predictive uncertainty defines epistemic uncertainty as the part removable by collecting more data, while the standard measure identifies it with a mutual-information term. We prove the definition and the measure are extensionally inconsistent. On an explicit construction, the measure assigns all uncertainty to the epistemic class, yet no quantity of training data reduces it. Reducibility is instead a property of the pair (uncertainty, acquisition class), and the dichotomy resolves into three parts: aleatoric, sample-reducible epistemic, and mechanism-reducible epistemic uncertainty. An exact identity for the value of an observation shows that in-distribution data never reduces mechanism-irreducible uncertainty and generically increases it. Ensemble disagreement, the deployed epistemic estimate, tracks the training procedure rather than the epistemic term. It collapses to zero beneath a positive truth under consistent training, and equals hyperparameter-scaled initialization noise under interpolation. A finite-sample falsification test and seed-swept experiments confirm the theory.
