# Creating and Evaluating K-12 GenAI Assessment Graders Through Context Engineering

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.12422 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.12422/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 6 of its 30 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 May 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contexts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.03172/) (2023)
- [Applying Large Language Models and Chain-of-Thought for Automatic Scoring](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.03748/) (2023)
- [Rubric Is All You Need: Enhancing LLM-based Code Evaluation With Question-Specific Rubrics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.23989/) (2025)
- [SkipFlow: Incorporating Neural Coherence Features for End-to-End Automatic Text Scoring](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.04981/) (2017)
- [Prompt Agnostic Essay Scorer: A Domain Generalization Approach to Cross-prompt Automated Essay Scoring](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.01441/) (2020)
- [Implementation Considerations for Automated AI Grading of Student Work](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.07955/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The integration of large language models (LLMs) into educational assessment represents a transformative shift in classroom grading practices. While automated scoring systems and machine learning techniques have existed for decades, generative AI (GenAI) now enables educators to implement standards-based grading (SBG) with unprecedented efficiency and scale. This paper examines the theoretical foundations and evaluates an LLM grader that uses commercially available foundation models with context and prompt engineering to score student work against a rubric. Drawing on an empirical interrater agreement study using Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) data, we observed the Quadratic Weighted Kappa (QWK) and Proportional Reduction in Mean-Squared Error (PRMSE) across mathematics, science, and ELA, using Claude Sonnet 4, Haiku 4.5, GPT-5, and GPT-5 Mini. The results demonstrate that LLM graders, especially when based on foundational models with more parameters, achieve substantial agreement with human raters in mathematics and science assessments, while the performances vary in ELA, suggesting generic foundation models can be effective at scoring in given contexts. Additional analysis of teacher and student feedback reveals strong acceptance of AI-generated narrative feedback but skepticism toward numerical scores, suggesting that LLMs function most effectively as formative tools rather than summative evaluators. Our findings indicate that thoughtfully designed hybrid models that combine AI efficiency with teacher judgment can reduce workload, enhance feedback quality, and support equitable assessment practices without displacing professional expertise.