# Pushing the Limits of LLM Tool Calling via Experiential Knowledge Integration and Activation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.10875 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.10875/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Tool learning and function calling, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 20 of its 33 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Tool learning and function calling](https://mlsanity.com/agents/tool-learning-and-function-calling/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.16789/) (2023)
- [Search-R1: Training LLMs to Reason and Leverage Search Engines with Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.09516/) (2025)
- [API-Bank: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Tool-Augmented LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.08244/) (2023)
- [AppWorld: A Controllable World of Apps and People for Benchmarking Interactive Coding Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.18901/) (2024)
- [ToolRL: Reward is All Tool Learning Needs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.13958/) (2025)
- [Learning to Reason under Off-Policy Guidance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.14945/) (2025)
- [Synapse: Trajectory-as-Exemplar Prompting with Memory for Computer Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.07863/) (2023)
- [Memento: Fine-tuning LLM Agents without Fine-tuning LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.16153/) (2025)
- [VerlTool: Towards Holistic Agentic Reinforcement Learning with Tool Use](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.01055/) (2025)
- [Agent KB: Leveraging Cross-Domain Experience for Agentic Problem Solving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.06229/) (2025)
- [Remember Me, Refine Me: A Dynamic Procedural Memory Framework for Experience-Driven Agent Evolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.10696/) (2025)
- [Nemotron-Research-Tool-N1: Exploring Tool-Using Language Models with Reinforced Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.00024/) (2025)
- [SWE-Exp: Experience-Driven Software Issue Resolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.23361/) (2025)
- [Knowledge Mechanisms in Large Language Models: A Survey and Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.15017/) (2024)
- [From Exploration to Mastery: Enabling LLMs to Master Tools via Self-Driven Interactions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.08197/) (2024)
- [Building Self-Evolving Agents via Experience-Driven Lifelong Learning: A Framework and Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.19005/) (2025)
- [Don't Just Fine-tune the Agent, Tune the Environment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.10197/) (2025)
- [CITI: Enhancing Tool Utilizing Ability in Large Language Models without Sacrificing General Performance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.13202/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [A Few Neurons Reveal When LLMs Misuse Tools: Sparse Detection and Selective Steering for Reliable Tool Use](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.00218/) (2026)
- [Beyond Simply Environment Scaling: Designing Effective Environment Distributions for Multimodal Agent Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.03571/) (2026)
- [SwarmBench: Can Large Language Models Act as Agent Swarm Orchestrators?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.30661/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) rely on tool use to act as autonomous agents, yet often fail in multi-step execution due to insufficient tool-related knowledge and ineffective knowledge activation. Therefore, we present a systematic study on how knowledge influences tool-use performance, covering the stages of knowledge acquisition, activation, and internalization. In the knowledge acquisition stage, we acquire and evaluate various forms of experiential knowledge, and our analysis shows that simple instance-level knowledge can already provide strong and reliable gains, while abstract intent-level knowledge offers limited benefits. At inference time, to activate knowledge, we find that prompting LLM to expand the depth of reasoning yields diminishing returns, whereas expanding the width of reasoning by parallel sampling with aggregation more effectively activates latent experiential knowledge. At training time, for knowledge internalization, post-training with knowledge-augmented data further improves performance, with reinforcement learning outperforming supervised fine-tuning. Based on these insights, we propose the Knowledge-Augmented Tool Execution (KATE), a knowledge-augmented tool execution framework that integrates experiential knowledge with reasoning-width-expanded inference and knowledge-aware training. Experiments on BFCL-V3 and AppWorld demonstrate consistent and substantial improvements over strong baselines across model scales. Our Code is available at https://github.com/hypasd-art/KATE.