# From Perception to Action: Can UI Interventions Foster Sustainable LLM Chatbot

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.10861 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.10861/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 12 of its 49 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.02243/) (2019)
- [Same Task, More Tokens: the Impact of Input Length on the Reasoning Performance of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14848/) (2024)
- [DynamoLLM: Designing LLM Inference Clusters for Performance and Energy Efficiency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.00741/) (2024)
- [A Systematic Review of Green AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.11047/) (2023)
- [How Hungry is AI? Benchmarking Energy, Water, and Carbon Footprint of LLM Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09598/) (2025)
- [Towards Greener LLMs: Bringing Energy-Efficiency to the Forefront of LLM Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.20306/) (2024)
- [Energy Considerations of Large Language Model Inference and Efficiency Optimizations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.17674/) (2025)
- [Offline Energy-Optimal LLM Serving: Workload-Based Energy Models for LLM Inference on Heterogeneous Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.04014/) (2024)
- [Towards Sustainable Large Language Model Serving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.01990/) (2024)
- [Towards Sustainable NLP: Insights from Benchmarking Inference Energy in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.05610/) (2025)
- [Greening AI-enabled Systems with Software Engineering: A Research Agenda for Environmentally Sustainable AI Practices](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.01774/) (2025)
- [Green My LLM: Studying the key factors affecting the energy consumption of code assistants](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.11892/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

LLM-powered chatbots are increasingly embedded in everyday workflows, raising sustainability concerns due to their energy use. Most mitigation strategies emphasize model or infrastructure efficiency, while the user-interface (UI) layer remains underexplored despite its potential to shape interaction behavior. We investigate whether sustainability-oriented UI interventions can increase users' energy awareness and encourage more energy-responsible chatbot use without reducing usability. We first conducted a baseline survey with 77 participants to assess awareness and receptiveness to intervention concepts. Guided by prior work on persuasive technology and choice architecture, we implemented a web-based chatbot prototype with a three-mode switch (Energy-efficient, Balanced, Performance), per-response energy feedback, pre-send energy estimates, a usage metrics dashboard, and energy analogies. We then evaluated the prototype in a five-day field study with 11 participants. In the baseline survey, 94.8% of respondents reported at least some awareness of AI energy use, yet 88.3% misestimated actual consumption. Although concern about environmental impact was high, only 39.0% indicated willingness to accept a performance trade-off for lower energy use. In the field study, Energy-efficient mode accounted for 55.8% of logged prompts, while 90.9% self-reported actively choosing Eco-mode when high accuracy was not required. Participants did not reduce prompt length, suggesting mode switching as the primary behavioral mechanism. Sustainability-oriented UI interventions can improve awareness and support more energy-responsible interaction patterns in LLM chatbots. These effects are best interpreted as behavioral and model-based estimates that complement backend efficiency work, and the provided prototype and replication package support further research on energy-aware conversational AI design.