# Beyond APIs: Probing the Limits of MLLMs in Physical Tool Use

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.10803 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.10803/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Embodied and 3D vision-language models, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 14 of its 18 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2026.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [Embodied and 3D vision-language models](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/embodied-and-3d-vision-language-models/)
- LLM agents and tool use / [Multimodal and embodied agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/multimodal-and-embodied-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.01691/) (2022)
- [PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.03378/) (2023)
- [ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.16789/) (2023)
- [InternVL3.5: Advancing Open-Source Multimodal Models in Versatility, Reasoning, and Efficiency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.18265/) (2025)
- [Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15334/) (2023)
- [SAPIEN: A SimulAted Part-based Interactive ENvironment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.08515/) (2020)
- [mPLUG-Owl3: Towards Long Image-Sequence Understanding in Multi-Modal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.04840/) (2024)
- [ManiSkill: Generalizable Manipulation Skill Benchmark with Large-Scale Demonstrations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.14483/) (2021)
- [ManipLLM: Embodied Multimodal Large Language Model for Object-Centric Robotic Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.16217/) (2023)
- [BEHAVIOR-1K: A Human-Centered, Embodied AI Benchmark with 1,000 Everyday Activities and Realistic Simulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.09227/) (2024)
- [RoboMamba: Efficient Vision-Language-Action Model for Robotic Reasoning and Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.04339/) (2024)
- [Creative Robot Tool Use with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.13065/) (2023)
- [Revisiting, Benchmarking and Exploring API Recommendation: How Far Are We?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.12653/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) excel at utilizing digital APIs and increasingly serve as the "brain" of embodied AI, instructing robots to interact with the physical world. In such embodied settings, a central capability is the use of physical tools, which underpins MLLMs' ability to assist humans in real-world tasks. Despite the importance, MLLMs' proficiency in physical tool use remains largely unexplored. To address this gap, we introduce PhysTool-Bench, the first physical tool-use benchmark designed to evaluate MLLMs' ability to comprehend real-world scenarios, identify physical tools, and plan their use. PhysTool-Bench comprises 2,510 queries over 2,678 real-world physical tools spanning diverse domains, including manufacturing, electrical work, agriculture, and healthcare. Concretely, models are evaluated along two primary dimensions: 1) recognizing all physical tools present in the scene, and 2) planning the tool selection and use sequence based on the instruction and visual context. Across 13 leading MLLMs, even the strongest model (Gemini-3.1-Pro) identifies only 58.7% of tools in a scene and completes merely 21.0% of queries end-to-end. Our analysis reveals a two-level deficit: MLLMs struggle to perceive tools in realistic scenes, and the much larger drop at the planning stage further indicates a lack of functional commonsense for mapping perceived tools onto task semantics, pinpointing a critical bottleneck for the development of practical embodied AI.