# Towards Diverse Scientific Hypothesis Search with Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.10587 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.10587/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 36 of its 67 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 36)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14325/) (2023)
- [Fast Inference from Transformers via Speculative Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.17192/) (2022)
- [Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.08600/) (2023)
- [CodeBERT: A Pre-Trained Model for Programming and Natural Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.08155/) (2020)
- [Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.03341/) (2023)
- [The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.06292/) (2024)
- [AlphaEvolve: A coding agent for scientific and algorithmic discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.13131/) (2025)
- [DeepSeek-V3.2: Pushing the Frontier of Open Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.02556/) (2025)
- [ChemCrow: Augmenting large-language models with chemistry tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.05376/) (2023)
- [Therapeutics Data Commons: Machine Learning Datasets and Tasks for Drug Discovery and Development](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.09548/) (2021)
- [Non-convex learning via Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics: a nonasymptotic analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1702.03849/) (2017)
- [Deep Think with Confidence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.15260/) (2025)
- [Sample Efficiency Matters: A Benchmark for Practical Molecular Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.12411/) (2022)
- [Controlled Decoding from Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.17022/) (2023)
- [LLM-SR: Scientific Equation Discovery via Programming with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.18400/) (2024)
- [Kosmos: An AI Scientist for Autonomous Discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.02824/) (2025)
- [Reasoning with Sampling: Your Base Model is Smarter Than You Think](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.14901/) (2025)
- [Symbolic Regression with a Learned Concept Library](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.09359/) (2024)
- [LLM-SRBench: A New Benchmark for Scientific Equation Discovery with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.10415/) (2025)
- [Sampling Can Be Faster Than Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.08413/) (2018)
- [Aligning Large Language Models with Representation Editing: A Control Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.05954/) (2024)
- [Efficient Evolutionary Search Over Chemical Space with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.16976/) (2024)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models in Scientific Discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.15567/) (2025)
- [ChatGPT-powered Conversational Drug Editing Using Retrieval and Domain Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18090/) (2023)
- [Accelerating Scientific Discovery with Autonomous Goal-evolving Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.21782/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [HypoEvolve: Genetic Algorithms Enable Multi-Agent LLMs to Discover Scientific Hypotheses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.15938/) (2026)
- [Dictionaries, Not Darwin: Set-Level Selection Beats LLM Evolution in Scientific Equation Discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.04108/) (2026)
- [ShadowMiner v1 - An Experience Report on Implementing and Measuring a Problem-and-Hypothesis Discovery Engine](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.04339/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) are on the rise for accelerating scientific discovery, most recently in advanced tasks such as generating valid scientific hypotheses. Yet in many discovery settings, the goal is not to identify a single best hypothesis since validation can be noisy and expensive, and scientists benefit from a set of high-quality alternative hypotheses that hedge against downstream uncertainty for the best solutions. Nevertheless, commonly used evolutionary search recipes tend to prioritize optimization over exploration in hypothesis generation, and the resulting selection pressure during the search process leads to diversity collapse. Motivated by these limitations, we formulate hypothesis search as a sampling problem, where the objective is to efficiently produce diverse, high-quality hypotheses under a fixed validation budget. Building on this perspective, we propose ours, an evolutionary framework inspired by the classical parallel tempering algorithm that searches hypotheses at multiple temperature levels and enables principled information exchange across temperatures to improve exploration without disrupting convergence. Across domains including molecular discovery, equation discovery, and algorithm discovery, our approach consistently improves both hypothesis quality and diversity under the same validation budget, and produces candidates that remain robust under more expensive downstream computational validations.
