# Human-AI Coordination Zones: A Framework for Designing Human-in-the-Loop Experiences with Agentic AI

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.09848 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.09848/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 29 of its 123 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 May 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/agents/general-llm-agent-frameworks-and-benchmarks/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 29 of 29)

- [Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.07269/) (2017)
- [Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team Performance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.14779/) (2020)
- [TheAgentCompany: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Consequential Real World Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.14161/) (2024)
- [Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.02478/) (2020)
- [CoAuthor: Designing a Human-AI Collaborative Writing Dataset for Exploring Language Model Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.06796/) (2022)
- [A Survey of Human-in-the-loop for Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.00941/) (2021)
- [Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.01167/) (2021)
- [Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: Reliable, Safe & Trustworthy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.04087/) (2020)
- [On Human Predictions with Explanations and Predictions of Machine Learning Models: A Case Study on Deception Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.07901/) (2018)
- [Expanding Explainability: Towards Social Transparency in AI systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.04719/) (2021)
- [A Case for Humans-in-the-Loop: Decisions in the Presence of Erroneous Algorithmic Scores](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.08035/) (2020)
- [Design Principles for Generative AI Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.14484/) (2024)
- [PromptPaint: Steering Text-to-Image Generation Through Paint Medium-like Interactions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.05184/) (2023)
- [Assistance or Disruption? Exploring and Evaluating the Design and Trade-offs of Proactive AI Programming Support](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.18658/) (2025)
- ["Are You Really Sure?" Understanding the Effects of Human Self-Confidence Calibration in AI-Assisted Decision Making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.09552/) (2024)
- [Investigating How Practitioners Use Human-AI Guidelines: A Case Study on the People + AI Guidebook](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.12243/) (2023)
- [Responsible AI Pattern Catalogue: A Collection of Best Practices for AI Governance and Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.04963/) (2022)
- [As Confidence Aligns: Exploring the Effect of AI Confidence on Human Self-confidence in Human-AI Decision Making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12868/) (2025)
- [User Experience Design Professionals' Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.15237/) (2023)
- [Machine Learning Uncertainty as a Design Material: A Post-Phenomenological Inquiry](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.04035/) (2021)
- [Inkspire: Supporting Design Exploration with Generative AI through Analogical Sketching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.18588/) (2025)
- [Jigsaw: Supporting Designers to Prototype Multimodal Applications by Chaining AI Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.08574/) (2023)
- [AI Mismatches: Identifying Potential Algorithmic Harms Before AI Development](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.18682/) (2025)
- [Machine Learning Processes as Sources of Ambiguity: Insights from AI Art](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.09374/) (2024)
- [The Entoptic Field Camera as Metaphor-Driven Research-through-Design with AI Technologies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.09545/) (2023)
- [Legal Provocations for HCI in the Design and Development of Trustworthy Autonomous Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.07506/) (2022)
- [Coping with Uncertainty in UX Design Practice: Practitioner Strategies and Judgment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.21397/) (2025)
- [Making the Right Thing: Bridging HCI and Responsible AI in Early-Stage AI Concept Selection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.17494/) (2025)
- [Towards Holistic Prompt Craft](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.06496/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

As generative and agentic AI becomes embedded in everyday products, practitioners face a persistent challenge: how to design human-AI coordination -- the ongoing mutual adjustment between users and AI systems as mediate through interfaces-that supports usability, trust, and safety. Existing resources offer high-level principles ("be transparent," "maintain user control") or low-level UI patterns, but there is a lack of mid-level design knowledge bridging the two. Through landscape and artifact analysis of 60 commercial AI applications, we introduce a framework defining human-AI coordination as the interplay of three dimensions: salience (how prominently AI is presented), involvement (what users can do to engage AI), and activity (what AI actually does). We contribute mid-level tools including coordination zones (done-for-me, done-under-me, done-with-me, done-without-me), an input taxonomy (prompted, sparked, inferred, layered), coordination curves for mapping user journeys, and design patterns demonstrating the generative capacity of the framework. The framework can be applied generatively to design experiences, analytically to evaluate existing ones, and communicatively to articulate ideas across stakeholders.