# Who Earns the Safety? Intervention-Aware Quantum Predictive Control with Safety Attribution

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.09778 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.09778/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 12 of its 20 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [OptNet: Differentiable Optimization as a Layer in Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.00443/) (2017)
- [Differentiable Convex Optimization Layers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.12430/) (2019)
- [Safe Reinforcement Learning via Shielding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.08611/) (2017)
- [Control Barrier Functions: Theory and Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.11199/) (2019)
- [The effect of data encoding on the expressive power of variational quantum machine learning models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.08605/) (2020)
- [Parameterized quantum circuits as machine learning models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.07682/) (2019)
- [Responsive Safety in Reinforcement Learning by PID Lagrangian Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.03964/) (2020)
- [End-to-End Safe Reinforcement Learning through Barrier Functions for Safety-Critical Continuous Control Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.08792/) (2019)
- [Safe Exploration in Continuous Action Spaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.08757/) (2018)
- [A predictive safety filter for learning-based control of constrained nonlinear dynamical systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.05506/) (2018)
- [Parametrized quantum policies for reinforcement learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.05577/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Hard safety filters are increasingly placed downstream of learned controllers to guarantee constraint satisfaction at run time. Yet a filtered controller that never violates a constraint may still have learned nothing about safety: the filter can silently repair an incompetent upstream policy, so that post-filter success measures the filter, not the policy. We argue that safe policy learning should ask who earns the safety - the policy or its protective layers - and we make this question measurable. We introduce Intervention-Aware Variational Quantum Differentiable Predictive Control (IA-VQC-DPC), which (i) trains a compact variational quantum circuit (VQC) policy under a primal-dual intervention budget that penalizes reliance on a differentiable Control-Barrier-Function (CBF) projection, and (ii) is evaluated with a safety-attribution protocol that decomposes the executed-trajectory correction into a CBF term and a deployment runtime-guard term, and stress-tests the policy with guard-off evaluation. On closed-loop, high-fidelity BOPTEST building-control emulators (5 seeds, 60 episodes per method), intervention-aware training significantly lowers the quantum policy's raw pre-filter violation and total safety-layer reliance (both p < 10^-4) with no significant energy regression; at an equal approximately 400-parameter budget the quantum policy is significantly safer and more comfortable than a matched classical policy. Guard-off evaluation confirms the improvement is policy-level and exposes a valuable negative result: a learned differentiable energy head is only safe when paired with a distribution-aware runtime guard. The attribution protocol is general beyond quantum policies and buildings.