# Civil Court Simulation with Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.09632 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.09632/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 9 of its 21 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.03442/) (2023)
- [A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.15594/) (2024)
- [From Generation to Judgment: Opportunities and Challenges of LLM-as-a-judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.16594/) (2024)
- [LeCaRDv2: A Large-Scale Chinese Legal Case Retrieval Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.17609/) (2023)
- [LexRAG: Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation in Multi-Turn Legal Consultation Conversation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.20640/) (2025)
- [CaseGen: A Benchmark for Multi-Stage Legal Case Documents Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.17943/) (2025)
- [Chinese Court Simulation with LLM-Based Agent System](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.17322/) (2025)
- [Simulating Dispute Mediation with LLM-Based Agents for Legal Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.06586/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Court simulation bridges legal education and judicial practice, yet human-based simulations are costly and difficult to scale. Large language models (LLMs) offer a scalable alternative, but existing court-simulation research mainly focuses on criminal cases. Civil litigation is more common in practice and harder to simulate because its claims, liability, and remedies are more flexible. We present a multi-agent court simulation framework for Chinese civil cases. The framework organizes role-based interaction through a five-stage civil trial procedure and integrates memory module and statute retrieval to support long-process adjudication. Experiments show that the framework produces reliable civil judgments, with clear strengths in liability allocation and multi-item adjudication. Further experiments show that memory quality substantially affects downstream simulation quality. Through a five-layer factor framework, we analyze how legal grounding, information conditions, judicial capability and role orientation, organizational pressure, and social context affect the framework's reliability and behavior. These results support the effectiveness of the proposed framework for civil court simulation. The dataset and code are available at: https://github.com/foggpoy/Civil-Court.