# One Model, Multiple Goals: Adaptive Multi-Objective Learning for E-commerce Dialogue Systems

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.09293 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.09293/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 30 of its 57 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 30)

- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [Learning to summarize from human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.01325/) (2020)
- [Personalizing Dialogue Agents: I have a dog, do you have pets too?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.07243/) (2018)
- [MultiWOZ -- A Large-Scale Multi-Domain Wizard-of-Oz Dataset for Task-Oriented Dialogue Modelling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.00278/) (2018)
- [A Simple Language Model for Task-Oriented Dialogue](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.00796/) (2020)
- [Deep Reinforcement Learning for Dialogue Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.01541/) (2016)
- [Way Off-Policy Batch Deep Reinforcement Learning of Implicit Human Preferences in Dialog](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.00456/) (2019)
- [KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01306/) (2024)
- [A Persona-Based Neural Conversation Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.06155/) (2016)
- [What makes a good conversation? How controllable attributes affect human judgments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.08654/) (2019)
- [Survey on Evaluation Methods for Dialogue Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.04071/) (2019)
- [UBAR: Towards Fully End-to-End Task-Oriented Dialog Systems with GPT-2](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.03539/) (2020)
- [GALAXY: A Generative Pre-trained Model for Task-Oriented Dialog with Semi-Supervised Learning and Explicit Policy Injection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.14592/) (2021)
- [Recent Advances and Challenges in Task-oriented Dialog System](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.07490/) (2020)
- [Injecting Domain-Specific Knowledge into Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.10708/) (2025)
- [SGP-TOD: Building Task Bots Effortlessly via Schema-Guided LLM Prompting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.09067/) (2023)
- [Generating Persona Consistent Dialogues by Exploiting Natural Language Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.05889/) (2019)
- [A Survey on Recent Advances and Challenges in Reinforcement Learning Methods for Task-Oriented Dialogue Policy Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.13675/) (2022)
- [Task-Optimized Adapters for an End-to-End Task-Oriented Dialogue System](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.02468/) (2023)
- [On-line Active Reward Learning for Policy Optimisation in Spoken Dialogue Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1605.07669/) (2016)
- [Refine and Imitate: Reducing Repetition and Inconsistency in Persuasion Dialogues via Reinforcement Learning and Human Demonstration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.15375/) (2020)
- [Mars: Modeling Context & State Representations with Contrastive Learning for End-to-End Task-Oriented Dialog](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.08917/) (2022)
- [Dynamic Reward Adjustment in Multi-Reward Reinforcement Learning for Counselor Reflection Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.13578/) (2024)
- [Naturalness Evaluation of Natural Language Generation in Task-oriented Dialogues using BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.02938/) (2021)
- [An Interpretable Neuro-Symbolic Reasoning Framework for Task-Oriented Dialogue Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.05843/) (2022)
- [Multi-Intent Attribute-Aware Text Matching in Searching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.07788/) (2024)
- [Flipping Knowledge Distillation: Leveraging Small Models' Expertise to Enhance LLMs in Text Matching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.05617/) (2025)
- [UOEP: User-Oriented Exploration Policy for Enhancing Long-Term User Experiences in Recommender Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.09034/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [ATLAS: Dual-Horizon Diagnostic Evaluation for Industrial Tool-Use Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.30685/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Dialogue systems in e-commerce scenarios often need to satisfy multiple objectives: accurately reasoning over user profiles (e.g., eligibility, credit limit) to ensure correct decision-making and user state interpretation, while also generating natural and faithful responses. These goals are complementary but not identical. In this work, we propose MORE, an adaptive Multi-Objective REinforcement learning framework that jointly optimizes reasoning accuracy and linguistic naturalness. Our preliminary experiments show that directly mixing rewards with diverging optimization dynamics can cause oscillations and unstable learning. Thus, instead of optimizing a single mixed reward, we treat reasoning functions as constraints that guide policy optimization. At inference time, the system directly generates responses without explicit reasoning steps, while still benefiting from reasoning-enhanced scaffold and avoiding additional inference overhead. To better balance linguistic objectives during response generation, we introduce an adaptive multi-reward mechanism that aggregates signals such as fluency and naturalness and dynamically reweighs them via gradient feedback. We evaluate MORE on two real-world dialogue systems at ByteDance and the MultiWOZ 2.2 benchmark, where it consistently outperforms strong baselines. In 14-day online experiments on ByteDance production traffic, MORE improves overall and reached conversion by 16.53% and 30.09%, while increasing user satisfaction and reducing handoff rates. Notably, in a human-machine comparison, MORE recovers about 60% of the incremental conversion lift achieved by human agents.
