# See More, Match Better: Multi-Source Feature Fusion for Two-View Correspondence Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.09262 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.09262/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 14 of its 36 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.07193/) (2023)
- [Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.14294/) (2021)
- [A ConvNet for the 2020s](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.03545/) (2022)
- [SuperGlue: Learning Feature Matching with Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.11763/) (2019)
- [SuperPoint: Self-Supervised Interest Point Detection and Description](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.07629/) (2017)
- [Learning to Find Good Correspondences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.05971/) (2017)
- [MAGSAC++, a fast, reliable and accurate robust estimator](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.05909/) (2019)
- [Learning Two-View Correspondences and Geometry Using Order-Aware Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.04964/) (2019)
- [Progressive Correspondence Pruning by Consensus Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.00591/) (2021)
- [BCLNet: Bilateral Consensus Learning for Two-View Correspondence Pruning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.03459/) (2024)
- [MGNet: Learning Correspondences via Multiple Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.04984/) (2024)
- [VSFormer: Visual-Spatial Fusion Transformer for Correspondence Pruning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.08774/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Two-view correspondence learning aims to distinguish true correspondences (inliers) from false ones (outliers) in image pairs by leveraging their underlying differences. Existing methods mainly rely on coordinate-based geometric consistency. However, they often struggle with pseudo-consistent outliers in scenes containing repetitive structures, textureless regions, or locally similar geometric patterns. To address this limitation, we propose TriMatch, a multi-source feature fusion framework for two-view correspondence learning, which consists of two parts: feature extraction and feature refinement. In feature extraction, TriMatch jointly extracts geometric, texture semantic, and structural semantic features to provide complementary evidence for correspondence discrimination. To bridge the gap between semantic and geometric features, texture and structural semantic features are aligned with geometric features through dedicated Texture-Geometric Alignment and Structural-Geometric Alignment modules, respectively. We further introduce a Semantic-Guided Correspondence Modulation module, which modulates geometric features using semantic information to suppress geometrically plausible but semantically inconsistent correspondences. In feature refinement, a Hierarchical Semantic-Enhanced Correspondence Refinement strategy progressively models correspondence dependencies and recalibrates multi-context feature responses, enabling more reliable inlier-outlier discrimination. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness, robustness, and generalization capability of TriMatch.