# Geometry-Aware Fisheye-LiDAR Fusion for Robust 3D Object Detection in Low-Overlap Setups

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.08844 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.08844/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 23 of its 30 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 23 of 23)

- [Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.01507/) (2017)
- [CBAM: Convolutional Block Attention Module](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.06521/) (2018)
- [BEVFusion: Multi-Task Multi-Sensor Fusion with Unified Bird's-Eye View Representation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.13542/) (2022)
- [KITTI-360: A Novel Dataset and Benchmarks for Urban Scene Understanding in 2D and 3D](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.13410/) (2021)
- [TransFusion: Robust LiDAR-Camera Fusion for 3D Object Detection with Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11496/) (2022)
- [PolarFormer: Multi-camera 3D Object Detection with Polar Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.15398/) (2022)
- [Cylinder3D: An Effective 3D Framework for Driving-scene LiDAR Semantic Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.01550/) (2020)
- [Cross Modal Transformer: Towards Fast and Robust 3D Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.01283/) (2023)
- [Detecting As Labeling: Rethinking LiDAR-camera Fusion in 3D Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.07152/) (2023)
- [The Oxford Spires Dataset: Benchmarking Large-Scale LiDAR-Visual Localisation, Reconstruction and Radiance Field Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.10546/) (2024)
- [F2BEV: Bird's Eye View Generation from Surround-View Fisheye Camera Images for Automated Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.03651/) (2023)
- [DarSwin: Distortion Aware Radial Swin Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.09691/) (2023)
- [PARTNER: Level up the Polar Representation for LiDAR 3D Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.03982/) (2023)
- [FisheyeDepth: A Real Scale Self-Supervised Depth Estimation Model for Fisheye Camera](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.15054/) (2024)
- [Convolution kernel adaptation to calibrated fisheye](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01456/) (2024)
- [PolarBEVDet: Exploring Polar Representation for Multi-View 3D Object Detection in Bird's-Eye-View](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.16200/) (2024)
- [Dur360BEV: A Real-world 360-degree Single Camera Dataset and Benchmark for Bird-Eye View Mapping in Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.00675/) (2025)
- [OccCylindrical: Multi-Modal Fusion with Cylindrical Representation for 3D Semantic Occupancy Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.03284/) (2025)
- [Adapting CNNs for Fisheye Cameras without Retraining](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.08187/) (2024)
- [FishBEV: Distortion-Resilient Bird's Eye View Segmentation with Surround-View Fisheye Cameras](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.13681/) (2025)
- [PC-BEV: An Efficient Polar-Cartesian BEV Fusion Framework for LiDAR Semantic Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.14821/) (2024)
- [Benchmarking Multi-View BEV Object Detection with Mixed Pinhole and Fisheye Cameras](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.27818/) (2026)
- [Exploring Surround-View Fisheye Camera 3D Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.18695/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

As autonomous systems expand from capital-intensive robotaxis to cost-sensitive logistics, sensor configurations are increasingly optimized for coverage-per-cost. A prevalent sparse-view setup utilizes dual-fisheye cameras with a roof-mounted LiDAR, introducing severe geometric challenges: extreme radial distortion, minimal overlap, and misalignment between spherical projections and rectilinear grids. BEV fusion algorithms typically force image and point cloud modalities into unified Cartesian grids early in the pipeline, causing significant feature distortion and information loss for wide-view fisheye cameras. To address this, we propose a Geometry-Aware Hybrid Fusion (GA-HF) framework that explicitly accounts for fisheye geometry and BEV feature distortion, where fisheye features are lifted into a polar BEV grid via a Distortion-Aware Lift-Splat-Shoot (LSS) module to preserve native angular density, while LiDAR features are processed in native Cartesian space for metric fidelity of bounding box regression. To bridge these heterogeneous streams, we introduce a Dual-Attention Warping Correction module that applies spatial and channel attention to the warped camera features before fusion, explicitly suppressing artifacts in low-quality peripheral regions while enhancing high-quality semantic cues. GA-HF is evaluated on three benchmarks: KITTI-360, Dur360BEV, and Fisheye3DOD datasets. To the best of our knowledge, it is the first approach to explore LiDAR-fisheye camera fusion. On KITTI-360, GA-HF improves NDS by 4.2% over Cartesian baselines; on Dur360BEV, it surpasses both LiDAR-only and BEVFusion, while significantly reducing orientation error despite the geometric distortions; on Fisheye3DOD, it attains the highest detection score among all fusion methods.