# Socratic-SWE: Self-Evolving Coding Agents via Trace-Derived Agent Skills

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.07412 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.07412/

## Key facts

- Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 29 of its 35 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Software engineering coding agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/software-engineering-coding-agents/)
- Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs / [Self-evolving LLM agents](https://mlsanity.com/synth/self-evolving-llm-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 29 of 29)

- [Let's Verify Step by Step](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.20050/) (2023)
- [SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06770/) (2023)
- [DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.14476/) (2025)
- [SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.15793/) (2024)
- [OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.16741/) (2024)
- [Group Sequence Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.18071/) (2025)
- [Terminal-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hard, Realistic Tasks in Command Line Interfaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.11868/) (2026)
- [Group-in-Group Policy Optimization for LLM Agent Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.10978/) (2025)
- [Absolute Zero: Reinforced Self-play Reasoning with Zero Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.03335/) (2025)
- [Training Software Engineering Agents and Verifiers with SWE-Gym](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.21139/) (2024)
- [SWE-smith: Scaling Data for Software Engineering Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.21798/) (2025)
- [SkillRL: Evolving Agents via Recursive Skill-Augmented Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.08234/) (2026)
- [TTRL: Test-Time Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.16084/) (2025)
- [SWE-RL: Advancing LLM Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning on Open Software Evolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.18449/) (2025)
- [R-Zero: Self-Evolving Reasoning LLM from Zero Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.05004/) (2025)
- [GDPO: Group reward-Decoupled Normalization Policy Optimization for Multi-reward RL Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.05242/) (2026)
- [Agentic Reinforced Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.19849/) (2025)
- [SPIRAL: Self-Play on Zero-Sum Games Incentivizes Reasoning via Multi-Agent Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.24119/) (2025)
- [Soft Adaptive Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.20347/) (2025)
- [SPICE: Self-Play In Corpus Environments Improves Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.24684/) (2025)
- [Self-Supervised Bug Detection and Repair](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.12787/) (2021)
- [Agentic Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Step Rewards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.19199/) (2025)
- [Toward Training Superintelligent Software Agents through Self-Play SWE-RL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.18552/) (2025)
- [Socratic-Zero : Bootstrapping Reasoning via Data-Free Agent Co-evolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.24726/) (2025)
- [BeyondSWE: Can Current Code Agent Survive Beyond Single-Repo Bug Fixing?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.03194/) (2026)
- [OPUS: Towards Efficient and Principled Data Selection in Large Language Model Pre-training in Every Iteration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.05400/) (2026)
- [Agentic Proposing: Enhancing Large Language Model Reasoning via Compositional Skill Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.03279/) (2026)
- [GradAlign: Gradient-Aligned Data Selection for LLM Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.21492/) (2026)
- [Optimsyn: Influence-Guided Rubrics Optimization for Synthetic Data Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.00536/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [Recursive Self-Improvement in AI: From Bounded Self-Refinement to Autonomous Research Loops](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.07663/) (2026)
- [The Last AI Built by Humans: Toward Genuine Recursive Self-Improvement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.11873/) (2026)
- [FrogNano: Training a 4B Coding Agent via Online Task Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.07925/) (2026)
- [Practice Makes Unsafe: Skill Misevolution in Self-Improving LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.12851/) (2026)
- [What Makes Good Agentic Data? An ACE Lens on Data Generation for LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.27260/) (2026)
- [Self-Evolving Coding Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.03392/) (2026)
- [Co-Evolution in Agentic Systems: Toward Self-Directed Evolution Beyond Human Design](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.10299/) (2026)
- [Where Is the Tradeoff in Using Third-Party API Routers for Agentic Software Development?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.23624/) (2026)
- [How Much Evidence Should a Coding Agent's Self-Correction Carry? Adaptive Dirichlet Evidence for Self-Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.08514/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

LLM-driven software engineering agents have become a central testbed for real-world language-model capability, yet their training remains limited by the availability of high-quality SWE tasks. Existing synthetic data methods typically create tasks through fixed mutation or bug-injection procedures, making the resulting distributions largely independent of the agent's own weaknesses and training progress. We introduce Socratic-SWE, a closed-loop self-evolution framework that reuses the agent's historical solving traces as a source of training signal. Rather than treating traces only as evidence for reward computation, Socratic-SWE distills them into structured agent skills that summarize recurring failures and effective repair patterns. These skills then guide the generation of targeted repair tasks in real repositories. Candidate tasks are checked through execution-based validation and scored with a solver-gradient alignment reward, so that the retained tasks are both verifiable and useful for improving the Solver. The updated Solver produces new traces, enabling the task curriculum to adapt over successive rounds. Across SWE-bench Verified, SWE-bench Lite, SWE-bench Pro, and Terminal-Bench 2.0, Socratic-SWE consistently improves over self-evolving baselines under the same compute budget, reaching 50.40% on SWE-bench Verified after three iterations. These results suggest that solving traces can serve as a scalable substrate for self-evolving SWE agents.