# mmPISA-bench: Do LLMs Reason Equally Well Across 43 Languages?

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.07069 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.07069/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 14 of its 18 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reasoning-benchmarks-and-evaluation/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [Language Models are Multilingual Chain-of-Thought Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03057/) (2022)
- [The Belebele Benchmark: a Parallel Reading Comprehension Dataset in 122 Language Variants](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.16884/) (2023)
- [Language Model Tokenizers Introduce Unfairness Between Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15425/) (2023)
- [Do All Languages Cost the Same? Tokenization in the Era of Commercial Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13707/) (2023)
- [Global MMLU: Understanding and Addressing Cultural and Linguistic Biases in Multilingual Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.03304/) (2024)
- [M3Exam: A Multilingual, Multimodal, Multilevel Benchmark for Examining Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05179/) (2023)
- [BUFFET: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Few-shot Cross-lingual Transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14857/) (2023)
- [Prompt Repetition Improves Non-Reasoning LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.14982/) (2025)
- [When Less Language is More: Language-Reasoning Disentanglement Makes LLMs Better Multilingual Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.15257/) (2025)
- [When Models Reason in Your Language: Controlling Thinking Language Comes at the Cost of Accuracy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.22888/) (2025)
- [Wait, that's not an option: LLMs Robustness with Incorrect Multiple-Choice Options](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.00113/) (2024)
- [mSTEB: Massively Multilingual Evaluation of LLMs on Speech and Text Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.08400/) (2025)
- [The AI Language Proficiency Monitor -- Tracking the Progress of LLMs on Multilingual Benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.08538/) (2025)
- [PISA-Bench: The PISA Index as a Multilingual and Multimodal Metric for the Evaluation of Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.24792/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce mmPISA-bench, a compact high-quality multilingual reasoning benchmark derived from the OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). The benchmark consists of 25 multiple-choice questions that require reasoning in order to be answered correctly. Each question is provided in official human translations to 43 languages and complemented with machine-translated counterparts (i.e., 2,150 data points in total). We evaluate two mainstream proprietary LLMs across languages, reasoning effort levels, and translation types in terms of their ability to answer the questions correctly. Our results show that modern LLMs can reason effectively across all evaluated languages, achieve accuracy comparable to human test-takers, with some performance variations across covered languages. We further find that machine-translated questions do not degrade accuracy relative to official human translations which suggests that high-quality machine translation (synthetic data) might often be adequate for large-scale multilingual reasoning evaluations where official translations are not available. Finally, we analyze token usage and related inference cost and find that LLMs usage in some languages is simultaneously more expensive and less accurate.